search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
LIA NEWS Ensuring product quality and process reliability


of laser-based additive manufacturing Dr Rich Martukanitz, of the Commonwealth Center for Advanced Manufacturing and the University of Virginia, explains how a performance qualification protocol in traditional manufacturing can be adapted for AM


L


aser-based additive manufacturing (AM) of metallic materials is receiving considerable attention for use in several industries, based on its ability to


dramatically increase design complexity with minimal increase in cost, its capability to easily customise products, and its capacity to act as a ‘point of manufacturing’ for on-demand items. Because AM is currently considered a relatively low production-rate process that commands a premium, many of its potential applications are directed at high-value components, and in most instances these components have high performance requirements. Tis means that a high level of quality and repeatability must be maintained throughout all stages of additive manufacturing – including design, material qualification and processing – in order to meet the performance requirements dictated by the applications of the high-value components being made. Te traditional method of maintaining a


specified level of quality in a manufacturing process is to define and conduct the process based on a performance qualification protocol. Tis approach, used throughout many industries, relies on sufficient defining and documenting of the important process parameters that enable key performance requirements specific to the product and application. Test results are used to confirm that the process defined using these parameters is capable of meeting the requirements of the product. Once the process is established and provides the desired outcome, these essential parameters are monitored and maintained. A concept for applying this approach to AM is shown above. Tis concept has been formulated to address


several unique features regarding AM. Tis includes the critical link between the design and manufacturing functions, the important aspects of material feedstock quality and processing system stability, and the potential use of process monitoring and/or sensing to


www.lasersystemseurope.com | @lasersystemsmag


A concept for utilising a performance qualification protocol for additive manufacturing


includes the critical link between the design and manufacturing functions of AM


This concept


ensure process reliability. Te design verification and process definition stage is an iterative process. Once the design and process are defined, qualification of the material, AM system, and entire process is conducted by confirming that the resultant product will meet the intended performance requirements established during the design verification and process definition stage. Tis is achieved by producing actual components, or simulated components, using the defined process, and testing the resultant product to confirm properties and/or characteristics that may define performance. Te AM process is conducted while thoroughly documenting all materials,


systems, and processing conditions that may influence the process and resultant product. If the desired properties are attained from the performance tests, the process is formally specified as being qualified to produce the design using these prescribed parameters and conditions. Essential variables that define the process are


monitored or verified to assure conformity. By continually tracking the variation of critical parameters and conditions, indications of trends may be used to intercede before exceeding established limits for controlling the


process. Monitoring and controlling essential variables may also be augmented through real-time sensing of process characteristics. Various sensing methods have been developed that offer insight into the process, as well as improve resolution for assigning consistency to the AM process. Tese sensor techniques, as they relate to the laser-based powder bed fusion AM process, include high resolution imaging for identifying layer anomalies or defects, acoustic emission sensing for indicating crack generation, and diode sensors for measuring laser attenuation and process stability. Te potential of linking and synchronising critical processing information, such as scan path vectors, with additional sensor data, may provide a powerful method of defining process stability and, ultimately, part quality. l


ABOUT LIA


LIA is The Institute for Photonic Materials Processing Innovation. Our vision is helping to make the world a better place through safe, optimal and novel use of lasers, optics and photonics, including quantum science and technology, and their application to advanced materials.


www.lia.org


13501 Ingenuity Drive, Ste 128, Orlando, FL 32826, +1 407.380.1553


ISSUE 42 • SPRING 2019 LASER SYSTEMS EUROPE 31


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36