search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
ORC


This is what losing that ‘life-and-death’ struggle with drag looks like in practice. Even close to layline a duck might have been a better choice… With the starboard tack J Class already sailing fat to get over Barcelona’s difficult waves, tacking to leeward was unlikely to work out well (it didn’t). To get these deep and sticky 150-ton yachts back up to speed is really one for the diary rather than for a stopwatch – however enormous those sails might look


No escape


Heading for the Offshore Racing Congress and, first time in an A380, wondering why this thing is nearly grazing the trees that surround Queen Mary Reservoir. It’s a big heavy plane and needs enormous wings to produce enough lift to fly. Induced drag (the drag that accrues from generating lift on a wing of finite span) is proportional to Lift2/(V2


x wingspan2 ) so the A380


suffers a double whammy; it’s heavy, so it needs a lot of lift to fly, but it has the same wingspan as the lighter planes. I’m sure the designers would have liked a wider wingspan, but then of course it would be impossible to squeeze into the airport. So the plane takes off at such a shallow angle, in part due to its high induced drag… a heavy plane with a low wingspan. For a sailing yacht the best way to minimise induced drag is to


increase draft, but of course class rules and water depth restrict this. It was an MIT paper in 1978 describing force models built to simulate yacht performance that more widely introduced the concept of Effective Draft that can be used in lieu of the physical draft for calculating induced drag. The cause: the presence of the canoe body pulls the keel tip vortices towards the water surface and results in an effective draft that is always less than the physical draft. On a yacht you have a simple heeling force meter, it’s the heel


angle – no heeling force, no heel. So now going upwind at 20° of heel your induced drag fate is sealed. The heeling force is fixed, draft is fixed, the only thing in play now is your speed; the faster


34 SEAHORSE


you go the lower your induced drag, which is great, until you have to turn a corner. ‘Ready about, lee ho’: immediately speed drops, through the eye of the wind the speed is still falling, sheet in on the new tack, heel to 20°, but now your speed has dropped. If you went in at 10kt and came out at 7kt your induced drag is


100/49 (102/72) = 2, it’s twice as high! No problem, you will be back up to speed soon. Next time you look at your logs take a minute to check how long it takes to get back up to speed after a tack – every second you are below target you have more induced drag than your opponents. Even a 5% speed deficit is 10% more drag. You can’t get away from it. These thoughts came to mind at the J Class Worlds in Barcelona


just before the America's Cup. Sailing a J Class yacht you are involved in a life-and-death struggle with induced drag. The rig is enormous, the boats are heavy, the draft is relatively shallow. This means that the heeling force is very high, 25 tonnes or more, the speed is not fast and induced drag is 30% of the drag even when you are going flat chat. When tacking your minimum speed could be less than 7kt, so


getting back to speed is mission impossible; you have the induced drag holding you back and the apparent wind way down because the boat speed is down. The boat is trying to accelerate with 30% extra drag and 40% less driving force from the sails. So it can take a long time to get going… and in very light conditions you still may


JASON LUDLOW


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124