search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Paul Cayard


Winner takes all


I don’t know the America’s Cup like I used to. I have not been involved for 10 years. Now I am a spectator, just like most of you... Fortunately there are now several commentators who are very well informed, spend lots of time analysing the performance differences and the why. While I am impressed by the technical evolu-


tion of these watercraft, I am not that interested in the Cup any more. However, I did watch most of the races this year and, since I spent 30 years in the Cup, I suppose I could share my thoughts and observations of the 37th. Also, it’s now or never because it will be three years before there is another one. My observations in no particular order:


1. Amazing how fast you forget about the competitors once they are eliminated. The only good thing about losing in the final (and I did this twice) is that you are the last boat on the racecourse… in the game longer than anyone, even the winner. 2. Impressive how much the starting game evolved over the two months of the latest event. All teams went from the one-manoeuvre prestart (for the port tack entrant), to two or three circles by the end. Was this just the helmsmen getting confident, or the output of the cyclors being able to keep up with the demand of that many manoeuvres in two minutes? 3. The cyclors have no profile. Luckily they have names. I had no idea if one team of cyclors was beating the other team of cyclors… putting out more watts than the other team. Certainly not that I could see.


32 SEAHORSE


4. The evolution of Ineos was impressive. It looked as if they had the right size of foils but did not know how to use them at the outset. Once they got sorted their ultimate top speed was better than the other challengers. 5. I thought the prestart penalty on Ineos in Race 3 was a bad call. In dialling down at 60kt closing speed ETNZ were relying on their own, and Ineos’s, rudder not washing out. If either of them had lost rudder control there might have been deaths. It was certainly a very aggressive move by ETNZ. Ineos responded as best they could to ETNZ’s constant course change, and both managed to keep clear. I don’t see a penalty on Ineos there. 6. I believe this time ETNZ and Ineos had slightly larger-area foils than the others but thinner sections. This allowed a higher top-end speed but probably made them very critical for the flight controller. 7. Impressive how small the rudders were in chord length and how easily they stall. Knowing where the edge is and how to re-attach flow if you go over the edge is critical. It seemed ETNZ was the best in this regard as well. 8. The evolution in onboard communications is impressive. Very professional across the teams. 9. The number of equipment breakdowns for Prada Pirelli was surprising and significant to their results. Bruni is my favourite sailor. There is something extra impressive about a guy speaking so precisely and calmly in a language that’s not his own. 10. Amazing how hard it was for a well-established team like Alinghi to come back into the game. That should serve as a warning to any dreamers.


VAN DER BORCH


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124