ESG Club


Jennifer O’Neill is an associate partner in Aon’s responsible investment practice


STRANDED ASSETS: GAINING IMPORTANCE FOR CLIMATE RISK STRATEGIES


Stranded assets are those which are worth less than expected – and less than the required level of return – as a result of the transition to a low carbon economy. Asset stranding can encompass: – Economic stranding – due to a change in relative costs of production or the price achievable for sale


– Physical stranding – due to inaccessi- bility or physical risks, such as flooding or storms, damaging infrastructure, or


– Regulatory stranding – due to a change in policy or legislation, for example, carbon taxation.


Transparent and responsible approaches to winding down stranded assets are viewed as an important part of the transition to low carbon economies. As a result, understand- ing the associated risks is gaining impor- tance for investors as they develop their cli- mate risk and investment strategies. Mark Carney, in his former role as Chair of the Financial Stability Board, stated that action that is consistent to meet the Paris Agreement threshold of limiting global temperature increases to 2°C above pre-industrial levels, “would render the vast majority of reserves ‘stranded’ – oil, gas and coal that will be literally un-burn- able without expensive carbon capture technology, which itself alters fossil fuel economics”. More recently, he suggested that stranded assets “could reach four- fifths of coal reserves and up to half of proven oil and gas reserves”.¹


This wide-ranging issue includes raw resources, such as unextracted oil and gas reserves, along with exploration and pro- duction assets, such as drilling rigs and vessels, or processing facilities, and distri- bution infrastructure – for example pipe- lines and tankers. And, while discussion often focuses on fossil fuels, it is impor- tant to recognise that the transition to a low-carbon economy will not affect just companies extracting and producing oil, gas, and coal. Other companies through- out the value chain could be affected, nota- bly those for whom fossil fuels are critical inputs for production. Examples of these would include transport logistics, aviation, and manufacturing, or those which are otherwise operationally energy- or carbon- intensive. The Bank of England and the French Central Bank² have stated that the impact from the transition on the finan- cial system through stranded assets could be between $1tn-$4tn when considering fossil fuels alone, or up to $20tn when looking at a broader range of sectors. Understanding the degree to which exist- ing assets may be impaired due to the realisation of stranded asset risks, will become increasingly important in informing decisions to retain or to divest from such companies. Close to $900 bil- lion – more than one-third of the current value of global oil and gas majors – would evaporate if policy action to align to the Paris Agreement target was implement- ed by governments³.


Legal obligations will also require inves- tors to consider, and demonstrate how they are taking account of, stranded asset risk. ClientEarth, a prominent legal group, have stated that “Private sector institutions have legal obligations to con- sider material risk – which would include stranded assets. If fiduciaries fail to inform themselves of these risks, it’s inevitable that litigation will follow.” Investors will need to think carefully about this issue as part of their climate risk strategy and develop a robust policy and approach to document it.


PI Partnership – Aon


The Bank of England and the French Central Bank have stated that the impact from the transition on the financial system through stranded assets could be between $1trn and $4trn when consid- ering fossil fuels alone, or up to $20trn when looking at a broader range of sectors.


A useful starting point would be to assess, and then build, a climate risk strategy using the recommendations of the Task- force for Climate Financial Disclosure (TCFD). We are working with investors, and particularly pension schemes, with multi-faceted and detailed assessments of their climate and stranded asset risks. Understanding the purpose of a compre- hensive climate risk strategy – one which takes account of stranded asset risk – and how this connects to better oversight, and understanding of portfolio-level imple- mentation, is an important first step.


Jennifer O’Neill is an Associate Partner in Aon’s Responsible Invest- ment practice, where she is respon- sible for client education, solution delivery and thought leadership. She leads on work with some of Aon’s largest clients and regularly speaks and commentates on responsible investment strategy and issues. To connect with Jennifer, email talktous@ aon.com or find her on LinkedIn.


1) Mark Carney: the world of finance will be judged on the $100tn climate challenge I Financial Times (ft.com) 2) NGFS - First comprehensive report (banque-france.fr) 3) Lex in depth: the $900bn cost of ‘stranded energy assets’ | Financial Times (ft.com)


Issue 108 | November 2021 | portfolio institutional | 29


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60