Industry view – Pension Protection Fund
Ian Scott is head of investment strategy at the Pension Protection Fund
THE PPF’S APPROACH TO INVESTMENT
The Pension Protection Fund (PPF) pro- tects the financial futures of members of UK defined benefit (DB) pension schemes. We currently protect close to 10 million people who we will compensate if their employer fails and their scheme is unable to pay them what they had been promised. Our investment mandate is to run a risk-controlled portfolio designed to ensure financial strength at times when others are facing difficulties. This has been the case with our reserves growing to £9bn at the end of March, from £5.1bn in a year. Our reserves protect us against future claims. For context, despite many scheme funding levels improving over the past year, 2,383 DB schemes remained in deficit at the end of October, with an ag- gregate deficit of £109bn¹.
This aggregated figure highlights the true risk that exists in the universe of schemes we protect. While our £9bn of reserves puts us in a strong position to face future challenges, many of the schemes we pro- tect have substantial deficits which could, if they were to claim, have a material impact on our balance sheet.
A key part of our unique mandate is hedg- ing all our on-balance sheet interest rate and inflation liabilities. In total, our liabil- ity driven investments make up around 40% of our assets under management. Once again, in an environment of height- ened volatility and sharply higher infla- tion, the hedge has more than proved its worth. The regular re-balancing of our hedge means we are never too far away from our objective to be 100% hedged. The remaining 60% of our assets are ded- icated to making a return, so that we have the resources to cope with claims in the event of future DB sponsor bankruptcies. Our mandate here is to outperform our liabilities over the long run. To achieve this, our growth seeking assets need to make an annual return of 3.6%, with mandated risk of between 3% and 5%. To achieve our investment target on our growth portfolio, we utilise a broad asset allocation, to benefit as much as possible from portfolio diversification – the closest thing to a free lunch in finance. Secondly, we hold a relatively large allocation (c.20%) in alternatives. Not only do alter- natives promise some of the best risk-ad- justed returns – especially infrastructure and timberland – but over time they offer a premium to compensate for illiquidity. We approach some of the more conven- tional asset classes in a less conventional way. In global equities, we run against a minimum variance benchmark. This has a lower risk than conventional market weighted benchmarks and allows us to allocate more than would otherwise be the case. We chose our benchmark to avoid a pitfall of minimum variance investing – sensitivity to interest rates.
We also believe in active management, albeit within carefully constructed portfo- lios, and with as few systematic biases as possible. In emerging market debt, we utilise absolute return managers to limit our downside, while in our absolute return portfolio we seek out uncorrelated strategies, often operating in niche areas of the financial markets.
Our relatively high allocation to illiquid alternatives has meant that we have made extensive use of liquid alternatives (deriv- atives, ETFs and listed funds) to manage our asset allocation, and we have added to these portfolios as markets recovered. Finally, we try to ensure our assets are not overly correlated with UK PLC, which is the source of most of our liabilities. Our performance has been good despite market volatility. Last year was a record in our growth portfolio, with a return of 17.6%². Of course, markets were favourable, but we more than exceeded our weighted asset class benchmark by 5.6%. More importantly, long-term per- formance has been ahead of target, with most of the outperformance coming from portfolio alpha rather than market beta. While investment performance has con- tributed to our balance sheet strength, we are not complacent. In our view, markets are likely to be more challenging: returns are likely to be lower, interest rates higher and the return of inflation is starting to undermine some correlations and rela- tionships. That said, we believe the key tenets of our approach remain valid and approach the next phase in the PPF’s journey in a strong financial position.
1) Source: PPF 7800 Index, October 2021 2) PPF Annual Report 2020/21
Publisher portfolio Verlag Office 5.08 – 5th floor Fleet House 8 –12 New Bridge Street London EC4V 6AL +44 (0)20 7822 8522
london@portfolio-verlag.com
Editor Mark Dunne
m.dunne@portfolio-institutional.co.uk
Deputy editor Mona Dohle
m.dohle@
portfolio-institutional.co.uk
Acting deputy editor Andrew Holt
a.holt@portfolio-institutional.co.uk 10 | portfolio institutional | November 2021 | issue 108
Publisher John Waterson
j.waterson@portfolio-institutional.co.uk
Head of sales Clarissa Huber
c.huber@
portfolio-institutional.co.uk
Marketing manager Tabitha Tebbatt
t.tebbatt@portfolio-institutional.co.uk
Head of roundtables Mary Brocklebank
m.brocklebank@
portfolio-institutional.co.uk
Sales and marketing executive Silvia Silvestri
s.silvestri@
portfolio-institutional.co.uk
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60
