The Pensions Regulator – Industry view
David Fairs is executive director of regulatory policy, analysis and advice at The Pensions Regulator
DC: INVESTING FOR THE FUTURE
For too long, the immature defined con- tribution (DC) market, with limited asset scale and a long tail of subscale schemes, has been overshadowed by the defined benefit (DB) market where investment innovation has thrived. That needs to change. Workplace DC assets are expected to grow from £500bn to £1trn by 2030. This creates opportunities for greater innovation in DC. Consolidation will help accelerate the pro- cess. The DC Master Trust market has reduced from 89 schemes before authori- sation, to 36; workplace DC schemes with more than 12 members have fallen from 4,560 in 2010 to 1,560 at the start of 2021. Those numbers are expected to fall fur- ther as consolidation, to achieve scale and enable better outcomes, continues. While the automatic enrolment market has been a significant success in ensuring more savers are providing for their retire- ment, more needs to be done. Too often the focus for employers, master trust sponsors and trustees appears to have been on cost, with the lowest cost often
having been the key determinant. Saver outcomes need to be the focus for trustee decisions and the advice they receive. The Productive Finance Working Group recently published a report: A Roadmap for increasing investment in Productive Finance Investments, which has been fol- lowed by the publication of the FCA’s Pol- icy Statement for their Long Term Asset Fund regime. We welcome these develop- ments and the potential they offer to unlock barriers to long-term investment in the DC market.
Investment in productive finance refers to investment that expands productive capacity. Examples include investing in plant and equipment, research and devel- opment and technologies. An underlying theme of the recent market developments is that investment in productive finance assets can help support UK growth and the transition to a low carbon economy. While those themes might resonate with trustees, ultimately trustees have fiduci- ary duties and they should only invest in any asset if they believe that investment is in the best interests of their members. They should also take appropriate advice. Consultants have helped to drive invest- ment and risk management innovation in the DB market over many years. Regretta- bly, the DC market has not yet benefitted from the same level of innovation. Lack of individual DC scheme asset scale, frag- mented and sub-scale DC pension schemes, lack of sufficient scope within scheme governance budgets and the wider industry focus on inputs (costs) rather than outputs (saver outcomes) may all have contributed to that lack of pro- gress. That needs to change.
We recently published a joint discussion paper with the FCA setting out a common framework for the holistic assessment of value for money across DC workplace pension schemes in the accumulation phase. However, ultimately, we believe that trustees, consultants and investment managers need to actively engage on these issues to help drive change and help accelerate the transfer of DB skills and innovation to the DC market. Trustees and their advisers can have a sig- nificant impact on saver outcomes. In set- ting out a roadmap and putting in place a structure around that roadmap to deliver change, the Productive Finance Working Group will, in time, create an opportunity for trustees to consider investing in a wider set of investments, with fewer bar- riers to implementation and with the potential to improve saver outcomes. As the recent industry developments flow through, we expect trustees to consider whether new investment opportunities that arise as a result of these industry developments, would be appropriate for their scheme. We would also expect trus- tees to be prepared to demonstrate to their members that they have considered the full range of investment opportunities for their scheme, in the context of poten- tial future saver outcomes and not just in the context of (lowest) costs.
Where trustees do not believe they have either the scheme scale or governance capacity to consider these wider invest- ment opportunities, we would also expect trustees to consider whether consolida- tion of their scheme into a larger arrange- ment might offer better opportunities for saver outcomes.
Design and production Portfolio Verlag
Printed in the UK by Stephens & George
Subscription rates UK £222 (9 issues), Single issue price: £27.50 Overseas €270 (9 issues), Single issue price: €33.50
Enquiries +44 (0)20 7822 8522
j.waterson@portfolio-institutional.co.uk
© Copyright portfolio Verlagsgesellschaft mbH. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form without the prior permission of the publisher. Although the publishers have made every effort to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this publication, neither portfolio Verlagsgesellschaft mbH or any contributing author can accept any legal responsibility whatsoever for any consequences that may arise from errors or omissions contained in the publication
ISSN: 2045-3833 Issue 108 | November 2021 | portfolio institutional | 11
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60
