search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
FOCUS


Take action Tracie Williams outlines what landlords and


building managers must learn from Grenfell, in light of the ongoing inquiry and reviews


being investigated on three fronts – through the coroner’s inquests, via a public inquiry and by the police. Even though these have yet to conclude, it is already abundantly clear that lessons must be learned from Grenfell and, with the recent publication of the report arising from phase one of the inquiry1


T , strong themes


are beginning to emerge. Among the most pressing of these is the


need for building owners and managers to act swiftly, and pay very careful attention to the testing and surveillance of crucial safety equipment. In the inquiry’s first phase report, chair Sir Martin Moore-Bick has outlined the themes that demand further investigation and that will be covered in phase two. These themes include the testing, choice and design of materials used in the building, as well as the installation, use and maintenance of crucial safety elements including sprinkler systems, fi re doors, lifts and the smoke extraction system. Sir Martin also points out that the failure


30 MAY 2020 www.frmjournal.com


HE GRENFELL Tower tragedy was the worst residential blaze since World War II and ultimately claimed 72 lives. It is currently


by multiple parties over a period of years to comply with, or ensure continued compliance with building regulations and related safeguarding legislation played a key role in the Grenfell Tower tragedy. Perhaps most importantly of all, he explains


how all parties involved in Grenfell had clearly failed to learn from a previous comparable fire at Lakanal House in Camberwell, south London, in July 2009. In other words, history has shown that it’s not enough to pledge to learn from previous events, as Grenfell has shown with terrible clarity that lip service is not enough, and that without innovation and ‘out of the box’ thinking, the current inertia surrounding building regulations and fi re safety will persist. This observation has also been made in


various reports and publications made since the Grenfell fire. This is not good enough. It’s time to change.


Innovation supports regulation


For all of the reasons outlined above, the second phase of the inquiry will have major


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60