search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
COMMENTARY by Jonathan Newell, Editor


HYDROGEN: A NEW TRAIN OF THOUGHT


T


he diesel locomotives that replaced steam power 50 years ago and were hailed as the ecological route to the future are now as vilified as their predecessors. Yet despite extensive railway electrification, there remain large tracts that still rely on diesel. Now, a new report from the Institution of Mechanical Engineers is calling


for hydrogen power to provide the traction away from electrified lines. The report states that investment in hydrogen trains is a vital part of the process to improve air quality but must not be seen as an easy replacement for electrification schemes. Hydrogen, which can be an alternative to fossil fuels, producing only


water as waste emission at the point of use, is a clean technology that can help decarbonise the railway industry. The basis of the report is that around 29 per cent of Britain’s fleet


currently runs only on diesel fuel, which emits large concentrations of particulate matter, and that hydrogen trains could be seen as a solution by government to avoid expensive electrification schemes. However, the answer isn’t as simple as it seems. The IMechE says that


hydrogen isn’t suitable for freight and high-speed trains because it requires a large amount of storage space. On rural routes, too, infrastructure costs for refuelling would be high and often trains on short rural routes originate in cities, where electrification already exists. An example is the route from Manchester to Windermere. Most of the


route is electrified but diesel power is required for the “last mile” of rural track. In this case, hydrogen power would be required for the whole distance and electrification of the last section of the route to Windermere is strongly opposed locally. Despite the difficulties of introducing hydrogen to the rail network, the





can help decarbonise the railway industry


IMechE recommends the following: n government rethinks the cancellation of electrification programmes and moves forward with a more innovative and long-term approach; n industry encourages the development and deployment of hydrogen trains and their fuelling and servicing facilities; and n hydrogen train technology be developed in industrial areas where hydrogen production already occurs and can support the wider transport system. An example of how this could be achieved is to refuel local hydrogen buses as well as trains at an industrial site and to pump hydrogen into the gas grid to help decarbonise heat. Both the North West and the North East could support test beds, sharing knowledge across sectors while providing cost reductions in hydrogen fuel.


Hydrogen ’


Testing& Test Houses EDITORIAL


Direct Line +44 (0) 20 7863 3078 Editor Jonathan Newell BSc


jon.newell@concordepublishing.com Design Editor Andy Warren


andy.warren@concordepublishing.com ADVERTISING


Direct Line +44 (0) 20 7863 3077 Advertising Manager John Harvey


john.harvey@concordepublishing.com SUBSCRIPTIONS


Direct Line +44 (0) 20 7863 3075


Concorde Publishing Ltd Orders Department, 100 Borough High Street, London SE1 1LB, UK subscriptions@concordepublishing.com


MANAGEMENT Finance Director David Fidler


david.fidler@concordepublishing.com Managing Director Paul Williams


paul.williams@concordepublishing.com ©Concorde Publishing Ltd 2019 ISSN 2632-0355


ConcordePublishingLtd


Publications by engineers for professional engineers


100 Borough High Street, London SE1 1LB, UK Direct Line +44 (0) 20 7863 3079


Also available from Concorde Aerospace Test & Validation


Automotive Test & Validation Climate & Vibration Testing


DAQ, Sensors & Instrumentation EMC Testing


Electronics Testing Test House Directory TestHouseDirectory.com


EnvironmentalEngineeringOnline.org.uk


This publication is copyright under the Berne Convention and the International Copyright Convention. Apart from


any fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright,


Designs and Patents Act, 1988, no part may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, electrical, chemical mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owners. Unlicensed multiple copying of the contents of this publication is illegal.


Inquiries should be addressed to: The Publisher, Concorde Publishing Ltd, 100 Borough High Street, London SE1 1LB,


UK. Views expressed are those of the authors and are not necessarily endorsed by Concorde Publishing Ltd. Data


and conclusions developed are for information only and are not intended for use without independent substantiating investigation by the potential user.


March 2019 /// Testing & Test Houses /// 3


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52