search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
❱❱ The “Harold” test rig at the IRR has a high capacity for testing new developments in rolling stock technology and wheel adhesion, below; UK innovation as part of UKRRIN will help to meet the European Commission objectives for increased rail freight transport by 2030, bottom; Huddersfield University’s IRR is built on the foundation of the city’s industrial heritage, inset


W


ith a heritage in railway engineering that stretches right back to the pioneering days of Trevithick and Stephenson at the start of the 19th century, the UK is still pushing the boundaries of innovation at a time when cost, efficiency and low emissions are


becoming increasingly significant. When British Railways Engineering (BRE) collapsed, the


industry privatised and the great engineering centres transformed into retail parks and heritage centres, it looked like the UK’s position in the industry had been lost forever. However, with a shift in emphasis and both public and private funding, there has been a resurgence of the kind of innovation that had previously characterised UK railway engineering.


ACADEMIC RESEARCH According to Professor Simon Iwnicki, director of the Institute of Railway Research (IRR), BRE had been engaged in intense levels of research but had kept it all to itself, without the involvement of academia. As a result, with privatisation came an associated steep decline in both research and innovation. “With funding from the EPSRC (Engineering and Physical


Sciences Research Council), Rail Research UK was set up and the Advanced Railway Research Centre began in Sheffield,” says Iwnicki. “This initial funding was also provided to six other universities, including the IRR, which was at that time based in Manchester.” Once the initial round of funding was complete, the strategy


was re-examined and it was concluded that there needed to be a network of innovation centred around a hub through which potential users of the innovation centres could go and through which the centres could find a route to new markets. The result was the UK Rail Research and Innovation Network


(UKRRIN) hub with three academic centres of excellence and a fourth testing centre for public funded organisations like Network Rail and Transport for London (TfL). The academic centres focus on infrastructure at Southampton, digital systems at Birmingham and rolling stock at Huddersfield.


THE ADHESION RIDDLE One of the areas of expertise that came with the IRR from Manchester during its relocation was the wheel to rail interface, an area of study that Professor Iwnicki and the IRR are engaged in. This is an important aspect of rolling stock design and constributes to the four Cs that are at the core of the institute’s goals – carbon, customer, cost and capacity. As Iwnicki explains, the adhesion riddle centres around the


very small contact patch between the wheel and the rail. Pressures are intense and the condition and geometry of the interface affect traction, braking, fatigue, squeal, passenger comfort and economy. A look around the laboratories at the IRR reveals an array of


test equipment relating to wheels, suspension and bogies (the articulating frame into which the wheels, axles and suspension are mounted). Such equipment includes rolling roads, a six-axis motion platform, vibration tables and fixtures for measuring forces and roll-out.


LIGHTWEIGHTING One of the important projects the researchers at Huddersfield is working on is lightweighting and moving away from the norm of putting rolling stock on bogies, preferring instead to investigate alternatives that involve the use of more active and dynamic components that will help to reduce weight without compromising load bearing characteristics or introducing undesirable effects, like rail squeal or discomfort.


June 2019 /// Testing & Test Houses /// 11





Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52