Drug Discovery
THE CANCER CONUNDRUM increasing clinical success by implementing improved methodologies in early phase drug discovery Using primary cells and 3D culture models to enhance cancer drug discovery
The high stakes of drug discovery and development lead pharmaceutical companies to be meticulous in ensuring a target is validated and that compounds are effective against this target in order to have the best chance of developing a successful drug. Taking into account the long-term investment of both time and money to find, test and develop a therapy for a disease like cancer, pharmaceutical companies need to better recognise the importance of using more robust methods, such as primary cells and 3D culture models, in early phase drug discovery to decrease the risk of late-stage failures.
I
t is common knowledge that the drug discov- ery and development process endures a long pipeline and involves massive spend by phar-
maceutical companies. One drug can take 12-15 years from idea to launch, bringing the total cost of a single drug to more than $2 billion1-3. However, despite an investment of more than $600 million in R&D alone, only a small number of drug candi- dates make it through to validation and develop- ment. With data showing that only one out of every 5,000-10,000 screened compounds make it to FDA approval4, it is no wonder that companies experience low success rates, equating to lost expenditures and time. Drugs tend to fail due to either efficacy or safety
concerns. While focus tends to be directed towards late-stage drug development and clinical trials to evaluate the efficacy of a compound, the early stages of drug discovery are equally important in determining the success of the drug. The efficiency of each phase, from target discovery and validation
Drug Discovery World Spring 2018
to assay development and drug screening, are all crucial for deciding which drug target(s) pass into clinical development. Consequently, re-evaluating the steps needed to improve the early stages of drug discovery is an emerging trend among phar- maceutical companies, emphasising the creation of more accurate disease models as well as more con- sistent methodologies. The effort is undertaken to minimise the risk of late-stage failures, save time, reduce costs and reduce the use of animal testing. In an effort to improve the early phases of drug
discovery where costly infrastructure or appropri- ate expertise may not be available in-house, phar- maceutical companies are turning to outsourcing. However, academic laboratories, pharmaceutical companies, biotechs and CROs have their own approaches to cancer research. As a result, data from these various sources will have originated from different research methods and need stan- dardisation. For collaborations between groups to be successful, data must be generated consistently
25 By Lubna Hussain
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72