search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Cell Culture


Figure 1


Spheroids show increased sensitivity to DILI compound treatment versus 2D cultures


l 3D cell cultures provide more architecturally rel- evant barriers for compounds to traverse than pre- sent in 2D cell cultures. Tissue absorption is a major factor in determining efficacy and many compounds have similar access to all cells in flat 2D cultures, resulting in overestimation of efficacy. l Mixed cell type 3D culture systems allow better modelling of cell-cell interactions than is possible with 2D cell culture systems and can even maintain neuronal inputs to the organ or organoid. l 3D cell cultures can be long-lived, in some cases for months. This temporal aspect of cell culture is important when modelling diseases that are slow to develop, such as neurodegenerative diseases. The relatively long life of the culture provides a system to identify pathological defects emerging in the tissue over time, as well as monitor the prolonged expo- sure of cells to pharmacologically active com- pounds.


Drug-Induced Liver Injury (DILI) assessment using 3D hepatocyte cultures A comparison of 2D and 3D primary human hep- atocytes for assessment of drug compounds to cause liver injury demonstrates the advantages of 3D approaches. Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a leading cause of drug attrition and clinical failure and can manifest as mitochondrial dysfunction, apoptosis, necrosis, hepatocyte hypertrophy and hyperplasia, fibrosis and cholestasis. The impact of DILI on drug development is clear – among the


26


drugs withdrawn due to toxicity during the period of 1990-2010, 26% were attributed to DILI. While 2D cell culture systems play a pivotal role


in research, classical systems do not reflect the com- plexity of liver tissue. Although hepatocytes are often the in vivo targets of DILI, primary human hepatocytes are not suitable for hepatotoxicity tests under conventional 2D monolayer culture condi- tions, due to the rapid loss of their hepatic pheno- types, functions and cell viability. In contrast, 3D cell culture systems sustain cell viability, maintain in vivo phenotypes as well as genomic and proteomic expression profiles. Compared with other 3D sys- tems, spheroid hepatocyte cultures require fewer cells, are technically easier to establish, and are adaptable to high throughput screening. There are several well-established protocols,


tools and reagents to support primary 3D liver spheroids and toxicity assays. Single spheroids can be generated using seeding densities with less than 5,000 cells per well on 96-well spheroid plates. Morphology and sizes can be routinely monitored and bioluminescent ATP assays for viability can be performed directly in the spheroid microplate. The primary human hepatocytes maintain Cytochrome P450 (CYP) drug metabolic activity in long-term cultures of up to four weeks. In contrast, 2D human hepatocyte cultures are short-lived, typical- ly lasting only one week. As shown in Figure 1, primary human hepato-


cyte spheroids are more sensitive than 2D cultures for detecting liver toxicity. Amiodarone, an


Drug Discovery World Winter 2018/19


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68