search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Cell Culture


Optimising clinical leads: increasing drug discovery success with 3D cell culture systems


Drug candidates often fail in the clinic for two reasons: they lack efficacy or possess an adverse toxicity profile. These failures can come at a high cost, especially when drug candidates have already progressed along the development pipeline to clinical trial.


A


dvances in three-dimensional (3D) cell culture systems are helping address the above challenges and improve the likeli-


hood of success for pipeline assets. From disease modelling and validation of novel targets to screen- ing for safety and efficacy, 3D cell cultures offer the exciting potential for the development of novel medicines and increased productivity. This article describes the benefit of 3D cell cul-


ture on the drug discovery workflow, with a focus on lead optimisation in which compounds are assessed for their potential metabolic liability and off-target toxicities. The powerful combination of human-induced pluripotent stem cells (HiPSCs) and 3D cell culture systems are also highlighted.


The 3D advantage A survey was recently conducted of researchers in academia and industry to explore the opportuni- ties, challenges and future of 3D cell culture. The need for greater biological relevance was cited by


Drug Discovery World Winter 2018/19


many survey respondents as the driving force behind adoption of 3D cell culture systems with the most common applications being disease mod- elling, oncology and toxicity screening. The advantage of 3D cell cultures for delivering


greater biological relevance is clear. When grown in two-dimensional (2D) monolayers, cells reside on a continuous layer of matrix, are not exposed to solu- ble gradients and possess an unphysiological apical- basal polarities. With use of 3D cell culture systems, along with matrices and scaffolds that simulate the extracellular matrix (ECM), tissue microenviron- mental cues are retained. Local soluble chemicals and the ECM environment facilitate correct cellular differentiation, function and communication. As a result, cells grown in 3D cultures more closely mimic in vivo physiology in terms of morphology, structural complexity and phenotype. When applied to drug discovery and safety pro-


filing, the advantages of human 3D model systems are clear:


25


By Dr Richard M. Eglen, Dr Feng Li and Dr Tony Frutos


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68