search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
LASTING IMPRESSION


The tender market has changed enormously over the past 10 years. Henry Ward looks at the importance of design cooperation early in any new build project to ensure the tender complements the mothership and delivers the required results for the owner


Ten years on, I am happy to say that we are now contacted by owners, owners’ representatives and captains to design and custom build tenders early on in the mothership’s commissioning process such that our current ‘in build’ projects have all enjoyed the benefit of comfortable lead times.


Each owner has a unique set of requirements and priorities so in an ideal world, we meet them or their representatives to find out what matters to them most, including how they actually wish to use the tender. Whether they require high speed, a comfortable ride, enough space for a large refrigerator


or


even a carbon fibre dog bowl – whatever they want, they can have!


This personal interaction informs our creative process and with a design in mind, we are then able to liaise with key players on the build team of the mothership in order to establish how our product can fully complement and integrate with theirs.


This collaborative approach impacts positively on the crew’s operations because we can advise on the required lifting arrangements, agree the space that is needed around the tender and plan the systems layout so that servicing is hassle-free.


to commission their superyachts first and then the tender as something of an afterthought.


S


Decisions regarding the tender came too late in the design stage of the mothership by which time the space available in the tender garage might already pose a constraint. This also limited the time available for a custom- built tender to be carefully considered and


ince I joined Cockwells in 2011, I have witnessed some welcome developments in the superyacht tender market. Back in the early days, for example, buyers tended


crafted before delivery of the main vessel was due.


Thankfully, most owners now realise that the tender they deploy from their superyacht impacts directly on the quality of their guests’ overall experience and requires a level of consideration equal to the design of the mothership itself.


As the saying goes, “you never get a second chance to make a first impression” and the tender is likely be the guests’ first, last and lasting impression of the owner’s luxury superyacht.


Cockwells currently has a 12m catamaran tender in build for which the client requires a top speed capability of 50 knots. By joining forces with experienced naval architects and race boat designers on our projects, we can be confident at the design stage that our tenders will achieve the required speed. For extra reassurance however, we tank tested this particular hull design at the Wolfson Unit in Southampton to obtain real-life scaled data to support our calculations.


In this case, the hull design was developed specifically for a particular client, but usually, it is far more economical for us to use a proven hull design that we already own the mould for. To date, we have produced


30 | TENDERS & TOYS | ONBOARD


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140