search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
EMPLOYER BRANDING


agents, and then promote these both internally and externally. In this way, others who share these same value sets are attracted to join the organisation and the brand is strengthened and continually communicated.


The value of brand experience Employer branding is critical to mobility success and is therefore


integral to the role of mobility professionals. Working with HR and the talent management function to identify appropriate personnel for relocation (be that domestically or internationally, from internal or external talent pools) branding forms part of the mobility function’s strategic approach to talent deployment. The movement of employees to service business requirements or


moving groups of employees in response to external considerations, for example in the case of Brexit, requires consideration of how relocated personnel and their families will support, reflect and actively promote the employer brand in their new location. As brand agents, relocated staff and family members can relay


a positive image, face-to-face and via social media, aligned with organisational values. However, if those involved are less than enthusiastic about moving or have a poor relocation experience, their brand messages can be damaging to the organisational image. Social media can lead to widespread reputational damage in next to no time.


Policy design and branding Besides the relocation selection process, the compensation and


benefits policy elements that apply to the move should reflect the value sets that underpin the employer brand. For example, a high- quality brand image which employees serving such a firm would promote, can be undermined by excessive policy component cost cutting, providing relocation service quality that is not aligned with the values that the employees are expected to promote. An organisational brand that suggests creativity and innovation


can be undermined by policy components that strait-jacket the support given to mobile employees. The current trend of policy segmentation to help address cost control can reflect employee differentiation, potentially indicating different levels of value that staff can bring to a role. In a single status culture, this can be detrimental to individual employee recognition. Once relocated and settled in-post, performance management


conducted to be aligned with company values would be expected to reflect brand principles. Again, the mobility landscape needs careful attention – different perceptions of brand, aligned to cultural value sets may require tailoring of performance management actions to ensure local responsiveness. In this example, for employer branding to be maintained, the process of establishing and measuring performance and how this is communicated require attention. For example, an up- front straight-talking culture may be inherent within the values of an organisation – where employees are encouraged to use constructive criticism as part of promoting innovation and new ways of thinking. However, in countries where direct communications such as


these are considered insensitive, relocated employees should expect to manage others’ performance in a less direct manner, or have their own performance discussed in a less confrontational way. This leads into the importance of ensuring relevant training interventions within employer and employee branding. Training is crucial if an organisation is to ensure that its employees


are ‘on brand’. The employer brand would be presented to employees both directly and subtly in terms of products, services, and daily activities with the brand image and values conveyed consistently as a corporate message. With respect to mobility, a wider remit encompasses brand image and values across different geographies. A recent case in point concerns the launch of IKEA in India, where


the artefacts of the organisational culture and its Swedish roots have been adapted to meet local cultural values. The IKEA brand is well-known globally but its local success in


different host countries has rested upon adapting its employer brand to fit. For instance, recent press reports on the opening of India’s first IKEA store focused on the representation of the employer brand and its ‘Swedishness’ described via its restaurant foods such as its traditional meatballs. Local cultural values have resulted in these being adapted to meet ethnic and religious needs but what remains to be seen is whether the greater cultural shift away from traditional furniture to flat-pack self-assembly can take off in the traditional Indian furniture market. So what lessons does this give to mobility professionals


endeavouring to support employer and employee branding when their organisations deploy people into non-traditional markets? In essence, it concerns a blending of customary images, values and activities that make up a corporate brand but with fusion into local customs and flexibility to address customer demands in new and unknown environments. Again, mobility professionals have an important role to play in promoting and gaining acceptance for appropriate training for relocated personnel which should not only deliver understanding and behavioural changes that address different cultural value sets but should also be employer-specific.


A customised approach An important outcome of the employer branding revolution is


therefore a potential departure from semi-tailored mobility products and services. Employer branding suggests, instead, the application and delivery of highly tailored, brand-specific mobility services that fully reflect, support, and continue to promote and reinforce, the brand. In turn, this highlights potential ramifications within the relocation


service industry. Even greater attention will be needed to get under the skin of client cultures to ensure that advice, support and services are culturally attuned to organisational brand. In addition, fine-tuning to reflect brand image and differentiation within different local country environments will be needed, providing services that match brand at a local scale while reinforcing global image. One-size fits all or off-the-shelf product and service approaches


are typically less expensive to deliver than those more closely geared to individual organisational requirements. But given the trend for cost reduction, a development towards greater mass customisation (involving flexibility, and personalisation of custom- made organisational mobility products and services but with the low unit costs usually associated with mass production), will be needed. Of course, it is generally the case that the relocation service


industry and mobility professionals within organisations do tailor their activities to ensure that the personal circumstances of individuals and families on the move are met, set within corporate guidelines and policy remit. The point about employer and employee branding though, is that the design and delivery of these actions must also be highly brand-specific. In this way, the outcomes and benefits of the employer brand


can be maintained and relocated individuals and their families can be sustained as positive brand carriers before, during and after their relocation experience.


For free downloadable factsheets on Relocation Policy Design & Review visit our Global Mobility Toolkit at bit.ly/GMToolkit


relocateglobal.com | 47


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64