In Focus Risk
The one figure that stands out
Why one statistic in particular is significant when it comes to the sentencing of money launderers.
Neil Williams Legal director, Rahman Ravelli
The increasing average length of sentences given to convicted money launderers in the UK, over the past decade, makes a strong enough story in itself. But, I would suggest that looking beyond
this may help us learn more about how this increasingly high-profile crime is being tackled by the authorities. And there is one statistic, which I refer to
later, that is perhaps more notable than any other. It may certainly be the case, as has been
reported, that money launderers are facing longer prison terms as a result of revisions to the sentencing guidelines in 2014. And the fact that the average prison
sentence for money-laundering offences rose to 27 months in 2018 is especially eye- catching when it is considered that this represents a 32% increase on the average in December 2008 – and that 27 months stands as a record high. Under the 2002 Proceeds of Crime Act,
money launderers can face up to 14 years in prison or pay a fine. In considering the increase in the average
sentence between December 2008 and 2018, it would be foolish not to attribute some of this to the fact that the sentencing guidelines of 2014 allow prosecutors to argue for tougher prison sentences for individuals found guilty of money laundering or bribery.
Tougher guidelines Sentencing Council guidelines have become tougher because they are seeking to emphasise the harm that financial crimes have on those who are victims of them. They intend for any penalty imposed to
take into account distress, inconvenience, or monetary loss that may have been suffered as a result of the offending.
38 It is not stretching a point, therefore, to
argue the guidelines have given prosecutors ample opportunity to aim for longer sentences for the UK’s money launderers. And it may be that, since the guidelines were introduced, judges have been prepared to accept prosecution calls for harsher sentences for money launderers. That may well be a large factor in the increase in average sentence from 2008 to 2018.
Unaltered In the past year, the guidance available to judges for sentencing has been unaltered. This means that the 8% shift upwards in average sentence length can only be attributed to two things. The first is the possibility of a sharp rise
in the sums involved when convictions are obtained. This would, by default, increase the average sentence length – and may arguably even indicate greater success in identifying and prosecuting money laundering. The second, however, is that the longer
It is not stretching a point, therefore, to argue that the guidelines have given prosecutors ample opportunity to aim for longer sentences for the UK’s money launderers. And it may be that, since the guidelines were introduced, judges have been prepared to accept prosecution calls for harsher sentences for money launderers
As I touched on earlier, looking beyond
this attention-grabbing statistic may tell us more. In fact, one related statistic that has not made as many headlines, may by more enlightening. Average jail sentences for money laundering have increased by 8% over the past year. Unlike the leap in sentence length we saw from 2008 to 2018, this cannot be accounted for by any change to sentencing guidelines that have given prosecutors the chance to demand lengthier sentences or judges the opportunity to meet that demand.
www.CCRMagazine.com
sentences are the result of a concerted push by the judiciary to impose punishments that serve as an increasingly powerful deterrent to those who consider money laundering to be a relatively low-risk criminal enterprise. There may well be many who are of the
opinion that money laundering is a risk worth taking. Maybe they believe a few unquestioned
transfers here and there, for modest reward, cannot really be considered worthy of attention or even that risky. They may convince themselves that it is not as if they are committing a fraud or whatever they consider to be a ‘serious’ crime. The knowledge that sentences are on the
increase however, and that money laundering is being viewed more severely by the courts should give them pause for thought. And if the headline-grabbing figure of a 32% rise in sentences over 10 years does not make them think twice, then the 8% rise in the past year certainly should. The past year has seen sentences rise
steeply. That should be a warning to anyone who still believes (or at least wants to believe) that money laundering is not really a serious crime. CCR
October 2019
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52