This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
The Last Word Comment


Recommendations for a framework of experimentation


Which Europe-wide policies should be in place to allow experimentation to take place for the benefit of customers?


The European Banking Federation


The EBF has published its detailed recommendations for an EU framework of experimentation, endorsing the ongoing attention of supervisors and regulators on testing frameworks in Europe. To support this objective, we have developed the following list of detailed recommendations for the development of an EU harmonised framework for experimentation. Our key recommendations are as follows.


Access to the testing Access to the testing environment should not be restricted based on the nature or the size of the business and should by no means be considered as a way to circumvent existing rules. The entry system should consist of a flexible regime that does not restrict entry to specific periods or slots, to allow firms starting the testing as soon as ready. Participation by institutions should always


be voluntary, and institutions should not be forced to participate. Moreover, participation should always be based on the interest of the participants to test innovative projects. All authorities that are relevant for the


project should be represented in the testing framework, for example, financial authorities, data protection authorities, consumer protection authorities, and AML authorities, according to a one-stop-shop approach.


Eligibility criteria To facilitate the broadest access to innovators, the eligibility criteria should be simple and based on the following key principles: innovative nature of the project, regulatory uncertainties about the implementation and clear benefits to the consumer.


Length and scope of the testing period The length of testing period should be enough to fulfil this learning process. Considering


50


Exit of the testing period Exit plans should be designed to allow firms to conclude the testing at any point without disrupting or harming participating consumers. The entry and exit process should be streamlined and avoid unnecessary bureaucratic constraints and should be agreed between the participating firms and the relevant authorities before the start of the testing period.


Exit plans should be designed to allow firms to conclude the testing at any point without disrupting or harming participating consumers. The entry and exit process should be streamlined and avoid unnecessary bureaucratic constraints and should be agreed between the participating firms and the relevant authorities before the start of the testing period


that the testing may be initially envisaged for a limited time framework of six months with the possibility to extend it up to other six months on a case-by-case scenario, when deemed necessary. During the testing period, projects should also be limited in scope to reduce potential risks to both users and the financial system.


www.CCRMagazine.com


Information sharing and transparency Transparency on the learnings from the testing should be enhanced by issuing reports on the outcomes of the tests. To ensure full consumer protection, customers must be aware that they are about to use a service or product that is under testing. Information sharing is necessary in order to leverage on the results of testing already undertaken in certain jurisdictions. This would allow shorter time to market and would support the uptake of technological developments. Also, all relevant regulatory and supervision bodies should be involved according to a one-stop-shop approach.


Cross-border coordination Cross-border coordination is the underlying principle underpinning the EU framework for experimentation and should therefore be enhanced across EU member states. The European Banking Authority, EBA, should take the role of central hub facilitating exchange of information as well as the gathering of legal interpretations of existing regulations by national authorities. An EU representation should be organised by the EU authorities in any international initiative to ensure that the views of the Union are represented and to allow EU financial entities to be part of any trials across multiple jurisdictions globally. CCR


February 2019


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52