search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Above: Eric Tabarly starts the 1982 Route du Rhum on his foiler Paul Ricard; the interesting solution to supporting the big early square-top main suggests parallels with the ‘headboard’ control systems now being developed for the AC75 monohulls. For the ultimate salty sea dog Tabarly’s thirst for innovation was unquenchable. Left: where will it end… it’s only just begun. A much larger foiler based along similar lines to this electric runabout is now being trialled on the River Seine for its potential as a future commuter craft


At low speeds the foils cause drag and slow the boat down, but as speed picks up the water flowing over the foils starts to lift the boat, drag is progressively elimi- nated and so the speed increases further making the foils even more efficient. The biggest question when designing a


foil for a sailing boat is to decide on a target performance range and therefore shape. Looking around at some of the newest foiling yachts it’s clear that there is most definitely no consensus on shape. The latest offshore foiling movement


was given a boost by British yacht designer Hugh Welbourn as he doggedly refined his original concept of a Dynamic Stability System (DSS). At its heart DSS is simply a lateral lifting foil that projects out from the side of the boat perpendicular to the hull and parallel to the water. When the boat heels the foil dips into the water and, a foil being a foil, it starts to generate lift which in turn increases righting moment and reduces the boat’s displacement as it tries to lift it out of the water. Sounds simple… The top Imoca designers were intrigued


and of course wanted to incorporate this technology into their latest designs but they ran into trouble with the rules that govern the class. The rule stated that there may be no more than five appendages and traditionally this meant the keel, double rudders and a daggerboard either side. It’s pretty hard to get rid of any of those


but yacht designers can be clever and that’s when, following the 2012 Vendée Globe, they set to work on the idea of combining


64 SEAHORSE


DSS with the daggerboards to get the benefits of both in the same appendage. What you end up with is a shaft that pro- jects laterally out of the side of the boat, an elbow where the foil makes a sharp turn upward to a triangular tip. The shaft acts as the DSS and the part that is turned upward replaces the daggerboard and limits the boat from slipping sideways. These new combination foils were given the nickname ‘Dali foils’ in honour of the iconic Spanish artist’s distinctive moustache. But the latest generation of Imocas


being prepared for the 2020 Vendée Globe have pushed the former Dali foil to new heights, and with widely differing opinions on what will work best. In fact, most of the new foils dispense with the ‘moustache’ flavour altogether, going instead for much longer and more powerful lifting surfaces that in many cases suggest a more refined return to the original DSS concept, but still allowing for the need to resist leeway. The newest foils are overall much


bigger, particularly in span, especially the foil as opposed to the shaft which in many cases now effectively form one continuous surface. Some offer a gentle curve while others are more abrupt where the shaft becomes the foil. In the case of the latest VPLP design, Hugo Boss 7, the foil is now of a constant radius – extremely long and with no surface discontinuities at all. It’s clear, however, that the Imoca


designers now expect their skippers to spend most of the time above rather than in the water and with this in mind for the


first time in sailing history the tables have been turned. Historically it has been the hull design that has dictated foil design. Now it’s the foil that is the driving force when it comes to designing the hull; this reversal was first hinted at in the design of the previous Hugo Boss, again by VPLP, with a more slender hull and longer, flatter foils than her rivals – ironically pointing to a return to the core principles of DSS. As Guillaume Verdier, the brilliant


French designer who has played a big part in many of the most successful designs, from Imoca to Ultim to America’s Cup multihulls (and now AC75s), says – and I paraphrase – ‘All we care about with regards to the shape of the Imoca hull is how quickly we can get the boat foiling. That’s the number one priority.’ As a further indicator of where foil


evolution may take us next, the foils in the new AC75 class have allowed any form of conventional ‘keel’ to be dispensed with altogether. Now we have retractable foils with ballasted foil arms, which together deliver both righting moment and lift as well as a component to resist leeway. Early observations of the first sea trials


of the AC75s suggest that this latest foiling evolution will take a little longer to settle down than the inherently more stable multi hull foiling platforms used for the last three America’s Cups. However, with this latest foiling genie out of the bottle, even- tually the technicians will find solutions to not only make for reliable AC75 America’s Cup yachts but, once again, perhaps for elements of their latest brilliance to flow down to more humble Mom and Pop craft. We shall see.


q


EASTLAND/AJAX/DPPI


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122