search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Shifter


The National 12 class in the UK has been the breeding ground for several particularly creative and free-thinking modern yacht designers including Bol d’Or champion designer Jo Richards and DSS inventor Hugh Welbourn. With few constraints and hydro and aerodynamic efficiency paramount, this non-trapeze class has seen imaginative solutions to very diverse questions. Now it is the setting for about as big an efficiency challenge as you could ask for… Designer Gavin Willis talks to current national champion Graham Camm


National 12 evolution since 2009 – and the concept of shape shifting The National 12 is a well-established UK development dinghy class. The boats have a light hull, just two sails and a crew of two. The first 12s hit the water in 1936 and designs have continued to evolve ever since. Modern boats are carbon-foam sandwich while many beautiful wooden vintage boats are still sailing, particularly on inland waters where a well-sailed older design can still be competitive in the right conditions. Thirty-two years after he appeared in


the class in 1977 with his dramatic Bouncer design (with which he won that year’s championships) a decade ago Jo Richards made waves again in the National 12 class with his remarkable


56 SEAHORSE


Dead Cat Bounce (DCB) design. Jo’s inno- vations in Dead Cat included a trim tab centreboard and a clever fat-head mainsail and jib, but the bigger step forward was probably the use of an unusual amount of hull rocker combined with aggressive use of a large rudder foil adjustable from inside the boat. Jo and his crew Sophie Mackley took the 2009 National 12 title with six wins and discarding a second. Since the 2009 wing revolution the


National 12 class has continued to evolve at a steady pace with competitors trying out different winged rudder configura- tions, until this year when Gavin Willis launched his radical shape-shifting Para- digm 4 design which can now also change hull shape to match the conditions. This


article describes the steady evolution over the past decade and explains the concept behind the Paradigm 4.


Wing development Winged rudders had been tried on National 12s before 2009 but with limited success. What Jo did on the original DCB was make them work in a wide range of wind strengths. The DCB wings were large, positioned close to the surface to intercept the vertical component of the stern wake, swept back and angled up (dihedral) to help with boat handling. Combining with the DCB hull shape that had a low wetted surface area and a noticeable bustle at the stern meant the DCB could be sailed competitively with wings on all the time. The wings have several benefits, includ-


ing reducing drag by flattening the wake and smoothing the transition to planing – there is no more steep hump to get over in order to get on the plane. Being only 12ft long and typically with a


narrow bow, 12s tended to nosedive in a blow and they also had an upper speed where they became quite a handful. With the wings there is no longer a speed ceiling and as you go faster the wings can be eased off, keeping the bow just out of the water. Sailing with wings does, however, require an adjustment to tacking and gybing tech- niques as manoeuvres need to be slower and smoother. Following the successful wing configu- ration on the original DCB there have been


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122