search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
All they will want at Marseille in 2024 is a little bit of Mistral… If there is indeed breeze and if the live access to the boats is as good as hoped, then the introduction of a two-handed offshore sailing medal might yet do as much for sailing’s international image as Eric Tabarly did for the sport’s recognition in France when he took a whole nation afloat with him nearly 60 years ago. Opposite: future Vendée Globe champion Armel Le Cléac’h training mid-ocean with co-skipper Fabien Delahaye for the 2010 Transat AG2R and (left) two-time Figaro Solitaire winner Nicolas Lunven practises for the same race in 2014 with his co-skipper Eric Peron. Lunven is racing the 2019 Transat Jacques Vabre on the 2009 VPLP/Verdier-designed Imoca PRB with Kevin Escoffier


To pursue this, World Sailing’s council will select a list of different


equipment it considers meet the key criteria by 31 December 2020. The recommended equipment list will ensure that event organisers, Member National Authorities (MNA) and the sailors have opportunities to train and compete in equipment that is geographically and financially accessible. It will also ensure that each MNA has a fair opportunity to prepare for qualification events and, eventually, Paris 2024. ‘This addresses a key area of concern. Normally when an Olympic


discipline is being chosen every country is focused on the equipment and how it fits their way of training and how they will qualify their nation to the Games,’ says World Sailing president Kim Andersen. ‘Putting the equipment selection first is usually an effective way


was quick to embrace the new concept. Other key influencers were onboard too. ‘As sailors we know that a lot of the racing we do is basically


endurance sport as we sail overnight; I think this new class will reflect that in the Olympics,’ said Oceanic and Offshore committee chair Stan Honey. ‘The fact that this will be the longest endurance event in the entire


Olympic Games also reflects well on sailing. I think it’s good in a variety of ways… from having a broader reach across the sort of sail- ing that lots of people do and then positioning sailing distinctively in the Olympic Games, while also making it easier to understand. ‘This class will be as simple as the Olympic marathon: the first


runner into the stadium and across the ribbon wins.’ Modern tracking technology makes this new discipline easy to


follow while plans to stream live footage off each of the boats, 24 hours a day, brings a whole new style of broadcast to the Games. Honey was instrumental in developing the award-winning LiveLine technology that provided such an innovative means of portraying the America’s Cup racing live during the last two Matches, and he knows this world well. He is clear on the appeal and advantages of having an ‘always on’ endurance sport. ‘One of the things that’s useful for the media is that having live


internet-quality video from each of the boats all of the time means that people anywhere in the world can “drop in” and take a look at the different boats at any time, whatever the conditions or the time of day or night. ‘Even when teams are drifting it’s interesting, because we all


know that the people who do really well at night are often the ones who gain a couple of miles that make all the difference the next day. So even when it’s light airs and seemingly boring, that can be when the races are won and lost. ‘Another idea could be to make it so that online viewers could


just click on their favourite boat and there would be continuous video from that team, along with a rough-cut highlights reel of the most interesting footage over the last six or 12 hours. I think it would make compelling viewing.’ All of which sets out an exciting new vision for both sailing and the


Olympic Games. But for many, of course, the elephant in the room is the issue of the expense and availability of boats. But here too views are evolving with a growing sense that an Olympic offshore campaign could yet end up less expensive than some dinghy pro- grammes. And certainly less expensive than was originally thought. Such confidence stems from the idea of holding qualifications


in chartered boats that are already available regionally. An initial feasibility study revealed that there are over 25 classes that may be suitable and already available region by region. Typically boats would be around 6-10m LOA and might include the new Dehler 30, Bénéteau Figaro (both the Figaro 2 and newer Figaro 3), SunFast 3300, L30, JPK 1030 and other well-known shorthanded designs.


of killing a new concept – look at what happened in Women’s Match Racing. We have learnt the hard way that to make a discipline work it needs to be driven by the competition, not by the equipment.’ Another key ingredient would be in holding back the Olympic


equipment selection itself until as late as possible, though no later than 31 December 2023... ‘A late equipment confirmation would mean that qualifying nations


should have finalised their qualifications before the OIympic equip- ment is chosen,’ continued Andersen. ‘That way you’re keeping a level playing field for competitors who will focus their efforts on actually getting a medal at the Olympics rather than gaining an advantage through having spent a lot of money and time procuring boats for which there is no demand back home. ‘This month’s World Sailing conference will address a number


of these points, especially around equipment which will provide an important stepping stone going forwards. Double-handed offshore sailing is on the increase worldwide and we firmly believe that offshore sailing as an Olympic discipline is a practical, engaging and exciting new prospect.’ So while 2024 may still be some time away, with key decisions


yet to be made, there are some who have already started exploring the campaign possibilities. Among them former Nacra sailor and Volvo Race crew Hannah Diamond: ‘I have always wanted to go to the Games but after we were unsuccessful in the Nacra trials for Rio I thought my chances were all but over… which is why I switched to offshore racing and the Volvo,’ she said. ‘But now, with my experience in both offshore sailing and Olympic


campaigns, this development has opened up the possibilities again. Racing with my fellow Volvo crew Henry Bomby we had a first taste with our double-handed Fastnet campaign on one of the new Jeanneau Sun Fast 3300s.’ Winning IRC 3A, along with being the first mixed double-handed


crew and taking second place in the IRC double-handed division, was encouraging for their prospects. But their participation also provided a snapshot of how Olympic campaigns could run within mainstream racing, to the benefit of both. Indeed, the 2020 Offshore World Championship will provide


another example along the road to the 2024 Olympic event. In October 2020 Malta will host the inaugural edition during the Rolex Middle Sea Race in which mixed double-handed crews will compete on Andrej Justin-designed L30 keelboats. National teams will charter boats in a 20-strong fleet, with the boats drawn by the sailors one week ahead of the championship. Offshore racing might not have started out as an obvious fit for


the Olympic Regatta. However, the opportunity it brings for sailing to better distinguish itself in the wider arena could deliver an unex- pectedly substantial step forward for both Olympic sailing and the sport as a whole. Matt Sheahan


q SEAHORSE 43


BENOIT STICHELBAUT


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122