search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Built around the engine box and on top of the hull’s structures, the total weight of the interior – seat, bunks, table, galley, heads, fairing, paint and everything else – is only 150-200kg. Its impact on performance is minimal


judel/vrolijk, the lead naval architect on the project. Cardin’s own personal experience was a good fit, notably his optimisation work on the HH42 Ino XXX (ex-Oystercatcher 30) which kept that nine-year-old production boat at the top of the IRC fleet for four consecutive years, with its offshore performance improving steadily every season (see Seahorse November 2021 issue). ‘We were very focused on Ino and we


‘We learned in CFD that a hollow in the underbody can work very well offshore’


were looking closely at Class40s,’ Cardin says. ‘We had in mind that there was a definite niche where you could combine those two concepts and make a very competitive IRC boat for all-round offshore racing. We started with Ino as a base line, compared it with a Class40 concept and studied the strengths and weaknesses of both directions.’ ‘The j/v43 is very similar to a Class40


in terms of how it’s built and the materials,’ Cardin explains. ‘We stretched the boat to give the clients more interior space. We used what we learned from Ino in terms of appendage design and sail configuration for IRC optimisation. The major difference is that Class40s are not optimised for IRC; that involves different design features, especially for the sailplan. In Class40 they can do pretty much what they want, they can use types of headsail that just don’t work for IRC. So the sailplan for the j/v43 is an evolution of the Ino learning process: flying headsail, inner staysail and so on.’ The operational use of the j/v43, which set the design parameters for the project,


is more broadly based than a typical Class40. Transatlantic races will be part of the mix, along with classic 600-mile events such as the Fastnet and the Middle Sea Race, and perhaps some Caribbean regattas, but the primary focus will be long-distance short-handed racing in the Baltic with two to four crew on board. Inshore racing doesn’t figure in the design brief.


The first step in the design process was


to decide on a scow-type hull. ‘From there we developed eight new hull shapes with


variations in features like chines, flare and maximum beam,’ Cardin says. ‘We ran some trials to pick up the right sort of hull geometry and then presented the results to the clients. It’s not as extreme as a Class40 because we still have a bit of upwind consideration in this concept and with a longer waterline the motion will be easier in waves.’ Proprietary software played a key role.


‘We have been developing our own CFD RANS code to improve the quality of our results,’ Cardin explains. ‘We can run any geometry we want, at any speed; we have a powerful computing cluster in house so





The five-winch cockpit layout is directly derived from the new generation of Class40s. Almost all sailing manoeuvres can be done in the shelter of the coachroof overhang


SEAHORSE 67


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124