search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Getting it down on paper


              


A spectacular result – François Chevalier A movement of discontent was growing over the years, the America’s Cup was not what it used to be! In 2010, when two gigantic multihulls competed against each other, it’s anything but match racing, just a race of speed. The next edition in San Francisco is worthy of a racing car event: they are 22m flying catamarans with rigid wings that battle it out in an arena. Then, in 2017, it’s the turn of the small AC50s in


60 SEAHORSE


Bermuda, barely 15m: never have we seen such small sailing boats in the Cup; besides, they are practically one-design – with the main exception of the foils and the all-important control systems where, along with their cyclors, Emirates Team New Zealand demonstrated the free think- ing and flashes of technical brilliance that would enable them to humble the might and near-limitless resources of the American Defender Oracle Team USA. But where is the tradition, the beautiful


manoeuvres of flying spinnakers down- wind, the gybes, the tacking battles! ‘We can’t wait for the monohull to return!’ said Italian Patrizio Bertelli, the owner of Prada. The Kiwis, who had just won the silver pitcher, agreed, but on condition that they go absolutely as fast as possible. And when we have just spent a few years two or three metres above the water it is difficult to go down again. In fact, one of the members of the Team


New Zealand design team, the Frenchman Guillaume Verdier, already has a nice project for a local client for a hydrofoil monohull. He and his friend Benjamin Muyl would be happy to take it to a higher level, a monohull on the scale of the Cup. The idea is to remove the ballast of a


maxi, and instead place a ton of lead in each of two foils placed at the end of two


arms extending out either side of the hull, which can be raised and lowered by pivot- ing around an axis. For the hull it will prove necessary to provide a small inter- mediate ‘second’ hull beneath the first to ease take-offs and soften the landings. The idea is launched, the AC75 is born.


But what strange shapes, never seen before, unless you look in the archives of the 19th century or at the eccentric hulls of some of the IOR Quarter Tonners of the 1970s… exceptions to the mainstream and notable for not having won any prizes. Four AC75s were initially built, and the


2019 vintage had its share of surprises. The four hydrofoil yachts built in anticipa- tion of the Cagliari and Portsmouth World Series meetings are destined for the scrap heap because the regattas for which they were intended have been cancelled. The teams’ designers responded to the


new AC75 rule with very different archi- tectural solutions, the Defender putting a virtual canoe beneath the main hull of their first boat. For the second boat every- one agreed that it was essential to create something like this thin lower hull, adding a sort of long keel, to cushion the landing and facilitate take-off and reduce the gap between the hull and water to improve the aerodynamics of the flying monohulls. It’s never easy to reproduce the shape of


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120