BETTER CHANGE STATESIDE
support tribal self-sufficiency, create jobs, and fund essential tribal services such as healthcare, education, and infrastructure. Commercial gaming, on the other hand, is typically operated for profit by private entities and may have different motivations and impacts on local communities.
It’s important to note that the specific regulations and laws governing tribal gaming and commercial gaming can vary by state and tribe, and it’s essential to consult the relevant laws and regulations in a specific jurisdiction to understand the nuances of each type of gambling operation. As I mentioned, one huge difference between the Tribal
and Commercial industry is the concept of Class II and Class III games. These refer to different categories of tribal gaming under the regulatory framework established by the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA) in the United States. The main differences between Class II and Class III tribal gaming are: 1. Legal Authority: Class II gaming is regulated by the National Indian Gaming Commission (NIGC), whereas Class III gaming is regulated by both the NIGC and the state in which the tribal land is located.
2. Types of Games: Class II gaming includes traditional tribal games such as bingo, pull-tabs, and non-banking card games, where players compete against each other rather than against the house. Class III gaming includes all forms of gaming that are not classified as Class I or Class II, including casino-style games such as slot machines, table games (e.g., blackjack, roulette), and poker.
3. Compact Requirement: Class II gaming does not require a compact (i.e., a negotiated agreement) between the tribe and the state, while Class III gaming requires a compact to be in place between the tribe and the state, which outlines the terms and conditions for the operation of the games.
4. Revenue Sharing: Class II gaming generally does not require revenue sharing with the state, while Class III gaming may require tribes to share a portion of their gaming revenues with the state.
5. Regulatory Authority: Class II gaming is regulated solely by the NIGC, while Class III gaming is regulated by both the NIGC and the state in which the tribal land is located, with the state having a larger role in regulation and oversight.
Although it’s fair to say that the tribal gaming operators are definitely more established and therefore are open to now considering innovations around safer gambling, it did still feel as though RG was a little bit of a bolt on to the IGA conference. There was only 1 session focusing solely on safer gambling and it was at 9am on the first day. This meant that out of the approximate 4000 people apparently at the conference, less than 40 were at the session. On a positive note, the session did discuss the initiatives
that are being implemented in the US to tackle responsible gambling. These included: 1. Self-exclusion programs: Many states have implemented self-exclusion programs that allow individuals to voluntarily exclude themselves from participating in gambling activities for a set period.
2. Problem gambling helplines: Many states have established problem gambling helplines that individuals can call to get help and support for their gambling addiction. These helplines are usually staffed by trained professionals who are able to offer counselling, referrals, and other support services.
3. Advertising restrictions: Some states have implemented JUNE 2023 35
advertising restrictions that limit the marketing and advertising of gambling products and services.
4. Responsible gambling training for employees: Many casinos and other gambling establishments provide training to their employees on responsible gambling practices. The purpose of the training is to identify problem gambling behaviour in players, provide support to customers, and ensure the implementation of responsible gambling policies.
5. Mandatory responsible gambling education for players: Some states have implemented mandatory responsible gambling education for players. This might include providing information on the risks associated with gambling, strategies for responsible gambling, and resources for getting help with gambling addiction.
There are also some clear stand outs in terms of RG best practice which include California’s Valley View Casino just outside San Diego who have dedicated resources to ensuring players are educated about gambling harm through signage, literature and events, as well as in depth training for their staff and any at risk players. Similarly, BetMGM stands out as one of the most
innovative operators. Their Responsible Gambling Manager is one of the most passionate and forward-thinking people we’ve met on this journey so far. Not only does he embody the Better Change ethos of promoting positive play, but he is a true pioneer. His recent work includes introducing therapy dogs to the casino floor to encourage people to interact and engage with their safer gambling material. With people like him in our industry, the future looks bright on both sides of the Atlantic!
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60
