search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
PROBLEM GAMBLING


gaming industry becomes involved in addressing problem gambling. There are often also legal requirements, and the reality that not proactively tackling the issue will likely lead to tighter regulation. There is the strong risk of gaming staff to develop gambling problems themselves, and at least hypothetically there may be a legal duty of care to customers. Given that definitions of problem gambling can differ, and


given that it’s about behaviour on a continuum from “no problem” to “serious problem” rather than a clear-cut physical issue, pinning down exactly who is a problem gambler – and how many there are – is a challenge in itself. But a number of tests, or “screens”, have become accepted,


where individuals are asked a series of questions and then scored according to their answers. Most notable among


these are the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS), Canadian Problem Gambling Index (CPGI) and Victorian Gambling Screen (VGS). Making sense of the results then depends on exactly how


you define a “problem”. For example, one interpretation of the SOGS classifies those who score less than 5 as “recreational gamblers”, those scoring 5-9 as “gamblers at risk”, and those with 10 or more as “problem gamblers”. Similarly, one version of the CPGI classifies respondents as “non-problem”, “low-risk”, “moderate-risk” and “problem”. But even if these varied approaches can lead to varying


results, they do clearly distinguish between people with problems and those without, and this enables researchers to estimate just how widespread problem gambling actually is.


FEBRUARY 2019 53


gstockstudio/Adobe Stock


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94