search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
EDITOR’S OPINION


An end to pricing uncertainty? Chris Jones


Managing editor of Energy in Buildings & Industry


T


he government’s decision to abandon plans to introduce regional electricity pricing in the UK has been heralded


as bringing an end to uncertainty and providing much-needed clarity to energy providers and investors. Yet it’s the time taken to deliberate on the pros and cons of such a move which has encouraged questions and doubts about future energy policy to flourish in the first place. A consultation on zonal pricing


was instigated by the previous administration in 2022 and Energy Secretary Ed Milliband had indicated that he was in favour of its introduction. The arguments supporting the practice of setting different electricity prices in different geographic areas based on local supply and demand, don’t appear to have changed, so why has it taken three years for the market to receive the clarity it was calling for? One of the main advantages of zonal pricing is its ability to reflect


the true cost of generating and transmitting electricity in different regions. Areas rich in renewable resources, such as Scotland with its abundant wind power, often produce more energy than they consume which isn’t properly valued under a uniform pricing system. It is argued that heavy electricity users would be incentivised to relocate to areas where electricity is cheaper, which would also mean that there would be less need for windfarms to be switched off in such areas because of the danger of them overwhelming the grid. Advocates also point to potential cost savings from less need to transmit large amounts of electricity long distances to areas of high population density. One likely downside of zonal


pricing, however, is that households in


... no doubt the resultant number of potentially lost votes in our towns and cities has helped to concentrate minds


urban or high-demand regions such as London and the South East could be faced with significantly higher electricity costs, disproportionately affecting low-income households in those regions. And no doubt the resultant number of potentially lost votes in our towns and cities has helped to concentrate some minds. The argument that zonal pricing


may introduce uncertainty for long- term infrastructure projects appears to have won the day. It is thought that an element of regional fluctuations could undermine investor confidence, with energy developers likely to be hesitant to invest in areas where future pricing is unclear or subject to frequent change. Coming to such a conclusion may


have taken an unnecessary amount of time, but the focus must now be on finding ways to bring down the cost of electricity for UK consumers who currently pay some of the highest prices in the world. A key part of the government’s strategy is to reduce our reliance on imported fossil fuels in favour of homegrown clean energy, thereby protecting households from fluctuating global markets. Investors of course want price predictability and it is hoped that the government’s pledge to deliver a more secure and efficient electricity system will begin to progress without further delay.


Contributors to this issue


Andrew Warren


Chair of the British Energy Efficiency Federation


11 Simon Dray


Strategy director at Energy Assets


16


Simon Marshall Business development


manager at Humidity Solutions


24 Alex Hill


Managing director at Whitecode Consulting


29


Louise Manfredi CEO of Leep Utilities


32


Energy in Buildings


& Industry PROMOTING ENERGY EFFICIENCY


Published by: Datateam Business Media Suite 16, Hawkesyard Hall, Armitage Park, Nr. Rugeley, Staffordshire WS15 1PU


Tel: 01889 577222 Email: info@eibi.co.uk Website: eibi.co.uk


ISSN 0969 885X


This issue includes photographs provided and paid for by suppliers


EDITORIAL Managing Editor CHRIS JONES


Tel: 01525 716143


Email: editor@eibi.co.uk Address: 1b, Station Square Flitwick, Bedfordshire, MK45 1DP


Assistant Editor CAROL HITCHCOCK


Email: carol@eibi.co.uk


DESIGN TIM PLUMMER


PRODUCTION PAUL FORSTER Email: pforster@datateam.co.uk


ADVERTISING Sales Managers


CHRIS EVANS Midlands & North


Tel: 01889 577222 Email: chris@eibi.co.uk


Suite 16, Hawkesyard Hall, Armitage Park, Nr. Rugeley, Staffordshire WS15 1PU


NATHAN WOOD South & East


Tel: 01525 716 143


Email: nathan@eibi.co.uk 1b, Station Square Flitwick, Bedfordshire, MK45 1DP


CIRCULATION & SUBSCRIPTIONS CURWOOD CMS LTD


Tel: 01580 883844 Email: pinede@c-cms.com


For overseas readers or UK readers not qualifying for a free copy, annual subscription rates are £85 UK; £105 Europe airmail; £120 RoW. Single copies £10 each.


PUBLISHING Consultant Publisher CHRIS EVANS


Printed by Precision Colour Printing Origination by Design & Media Solutions


18,608 ABC Audited Circulation Jan-Dec 2024


Visit us online to keep up to date with all the latest energy news and events www.eibi.co.uk 04 EIBI | JULY � AUGUST 2025


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36