search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
EDITOR’S OPINION


Winning over nuclear sceptics Chris Jones


Managing editor of Energy in Buildings & Industry


T


he UK economy might be flat-lining, but that has not discouraged the government from doubling down on its


commitment to growth. To realise its ambitions, Ministers have declared a war on nimbyism, saying they are determined to overcome planning objections and combat those who may object to the advancement of country-wide housing developments and construction projects. It seems that one of the key elements of the growth strategy is to look to the future and embrace the uncertain world of Al. It is hoped that some of the global digital behemoths can be persuaded to look favourably on these shores and put some money behind the establishment of data centres and transmission networks. The number of jobs that will either be created or destroyed as a result of such endeavours is difficult to predict, but it is widely assumed that their power-intensive activities will represent a significant drain on


the nation’s energy supply. With the ongoing efforts to ensure that we are not overly reliant on energy imported from overseas, can the grid cope with such a surge in demand? The growing urgency to address the issue is perhaps partly behind the government’s recent pledge to “rip up the rules” by allowing a new breed of mini nuclear reactors to be built in the UK for the first time. The development of these small modular reactors (SMRs) means that nuclear power plants need to no longer be restricted to coastal areas, where there is a ready supply of water, and can instead be situated to nearby reservoirs and rivers. It’s easy to see why politicians might be excited by the thought of a reliable source of affordable low-


Those who remain unconvinced by arguments for more nuclear power might be consoled by the time it has taken to get other nuclear projects up and running


carbon electricity, but unfortunately the word ‘nuclear’ continues to conjure up negative thoughts for much of the population. It’s one thing overcoming local opposition to a new housing development, but there could be much bigger battles to be fought over the construction of a nuclear power plant just up the road. It is thought that households close


to nuclear sites might be enticed by the prospect of lower energy bills. However, while SMRs may be based on existing technology, their commercial viability is still yet to be proven and they remain largely untested in other parts of the world. Unless the government can provide a convincing case for their safety and address the issue of nuclear waste management, then it is hard to see how they can win over the sceptics. Those who remain unconvinced by


arguments for more nuclear power might be consoled by the time it has so far taken to get other nuclear projects up and running. Hinkley Point C, which was originally planned to produce electricity in 2017 has been beset by delays and cost increases and is now unlikely to be completed before 2030. As much as the Labour government may be keen to press on the nuclear accelerator, they are likely to have to dodge quite a few obstacles on the road ahead.


Contributors to this issue


Andrew Warren


Chair of the British Energy Efficiency Federation


09


Chris Caton Product director at


Ideal Heating 11


Darran Smith Technical manager


at Alpha 14


Stephen Hart Director of integrated


solutions at Baxi 23


Richard Raeburn engineer at Tridonic


29 Senior application


Energy in Buildings


& Industry PROMOTING ENERGY EFFICIENCY


Published by: Datateam Business Media Suite 16, Hawkesyard Hall, Armitage Park, Nr. Rugeley, Staffordshire WS15 1PU


Tel: 01889 577222 Email: info@eibi.co.uk Website: eibi.co.uk


ISSN 0969 885X


This issue includes photographs provided and paid for by suppliers


EDITORIAL Managing Editor CHRIS JONES


Tel: 01525 716143


Email: editor@eibi.co.uk Address: 1b, Station Square Flitwick, Bedfordshire, MK45 1DP


Assistant Editor CAROL HITCHCOCK


Email: carol@eibi.co.uk


DESIGN TIM PLUMMER


PRODUCTION PAUL FORSTER Email: pforster@datateam.co.uk


ADVERTISING Sales Managers


CHRIS EVANS Midlands & North


Tel: 01889 577222 Email: chris@eibi.co.uk


Suite 16, Hawkesyard Hall, Armitage Park, Nr. Rugeley, Staffordshire WS15 1PU


NATHAN WOOD South & East


Tel: 01525 716 143


Email: nathan@eibi.co.uk 1b, Station Square Flitwick, Bedfordshire, MK45 1DP


CIRCULATION & SUBSCRIPTIONS CURWOOD CMS LTD


Tel: 01580 883844 Email: pinede@c-cms.com


For overseas readers or UK readers not qualifying for a free copy, annual subscription rates are £85 UK; £105 Europe airmail; £120 RoW. Single copies £10 each.


PUBLISHING Consultant Publisher CHRIS EVANS


Printed by Precision Colour Printing Origination by Design & Media Solutions


13,679 ABC Audited Circulation Jan-Dec 2023


Visit us online to keep up to date with all the latest energy news and events www.eibi.co.uk 04 EIBI | FEBRUARY 2025


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36