FEATURE u Machine Building
However, with design considerations such as electromagnetic interference and current control, this process is likely to take at least three months or more. Instead, an off-the-shelf PCB-mounted amplifier can be integrated, still providing advanced features such as safety controls, while saving development time. The other primary component decision is the motion control chip itself. Using a separate micoprocessor gives the freedom to write a customised motion engine code. This affords complete flexibility over motion functions, but development would add at least 12 months to the project. To enable communication with the host
network and coordinate motion sequences, microprocessor system software code development is also required, taking up to six months. Like the approach to the amplifier, alternatively an off-the-shelf motion control chip can be integrated into a custom-designed PCB controller to save time. This would give the OEM control over attributes including the PCB’s form factor, while still providing motion capabilities such as profile generation and field oriented control. Progressing to the PCB schematic, this stage
requires research, selection, and testing of components to achieve the circuit. Integrating the control chip and amplifier, the latter would also require a dedicated circuit. In total, at least 12 months should be allowed for PCB schematic development.
Whether the application requires a build-from-scratch, buy-in, or hybrid approach, INMOCO and Performance Motion Devices can provide the optimal control solution
The final aspect of the software development
process is application and motion parameter development. The timespan depends on previous application development experience but can take from 12 to 16 months. However, whether the motion controller is an in-house build, a buy-in, or a hybrid design, this stage of motion control development is a prerequisite.
With an estimated total of 34-58 months’
work, divided into a three-person team this project could take up to 18 months or more. Notwithstanding the design effort, for some OEMs, the long-term advantages may be worth it.
BUYING-IN A MOTION CONTROLLER All of these steps, except for the application and motion parameter development, can instead be removed by using a ready-to-go PCB-based motion controller. This effectively reduces development time to a little over a year and
doesn’t necessarily mean a sacrifice in motion control features. As well as functionality such as profile and servo position control, integrating user downloadable code written with C language libraries also extends their control flexibility. An advantage of buying-in an off-the-shelf motion controller is that it can also be more cost-effective if a lower volume is required. Perhaps up to approximately 1,000 units, integrating a pre-developed controller could be the less expensive option. If your organisation doesn’t have the existing development know-how in house, this approach could also save significant cost in hiring the required expertise. Quicker development also means faster time to market. Demands of end users and the competitive landscape, might make this the preferable approach, even for higher volume projects.
HYBRID PCB-MOTION CONTROL DEVELOPMENT Now, it’s possible for OEMs to use a hybrid approach that features PCB-mounted motion control modules. These single-axis modules can handle up to 1kW and can execute user-written application software, extending control flexibility. Just like an off-the-shelf controller, these modules include advanced motion functions such as profiling, field oriented control, and safety. The advantage though is the ease and speed of integration. Mounted on a user designed, application-specific interconnect board, these modules require much simplified wiring, needing just connectors and capacitors. Like the buy-in option, the engineering
resources required are significantly lower. Following simplified hardware integration, engineers can move directly to application development. This approach however still lets the OEM create a controller within their own form factor. Given the right volume, procurement cost of the hybrid approach can also return a lower rate than the buy-in option.
MAKING THE CHOICE To navigate priorities in design, INMOCO’s engineers can interface with OEM development teams, providing insights to clarify the right approach. INMOCO works alongside Performance Motion Devices, a motion control manufacturer that has innovated the embedded PCB motion control concept. Whether the application requires a build-from-scratch, buy-in, or hybrid approach, INMOCO and Performance Motion Devices can provide the optimal control solution.
INMOCO
www.irish-manufacturing.com
www.inmoco.co.uk Irish Manufacturing November 2022 17
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40
