search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
DS-MAY24-PG24+25_Layout 1 10/05/2024 14:51 Page 2


SENSORS & SENSING SYSTEMS


FEATURE


D TEMPERATURE SENSORS T FACTORY AGE


into an industrial RTD-based temperature (and other types of) sensor. The transceiver enables a sensor independent of the industrial network because it communicates directly with an IO-Link host installed at the process controller side, which manages communication with the interface ASIC as shown in Figure 6.


Figure 4. An AFE implemented using separate discrete components in the signal chain


replace five of the signal-chain components from the previous figure, significantly reducing the amount of board space required and enabling a sensor with a much smaller enclosure.


COMMUNICATIONS INTERFACE Most industrial sensors are designed to connect to a process controller using one (or more) industrial networks, including the many variants of field bus or Industrial Ethernet. This requires an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC) to implement the selected network protocols. This approach, however, has several


disadvantages. Firstly, including a network- specific ASIC in the sensor design significantly increases cost, especially if the industrial networks are proprietary. It also limits the market for a sensor to those customers using that network. For the same sensor to work with different network protocols requires redesigning to include the necessary ASIC, which can be time-consuming, high risk, and expensive. Finally, the number and type of diagnostic features vary significantly by network type (with some providing none). Depending on the choice, it can be difficult for factory operators to identify and maintain sensors and any performance issues that arise once they have been installed in the field. A better approach is to design a sensor independent of all industrial networks, thereby reducing development costs and broadening the potential customer base. This can be done using IO-Link, a 3-wire industrial communications standard that links sensors (and actuators) with all industrial control networks. In IO-Link applications, a transceiver acts as the physical layer interface to a microcontroller


running the data-link layer protocol. The advantage of using IO-Link is that it carries four different types of transmissions: process data, diagnostics, configuration, and events, allowing sensors to be quickly identified, traced and attended to if a malfunction occurs. It also enables remote configuration – for example, if the temperature threshold for a process alarm to be triggered requires changing, this can be done remotely without needing a technician to step onto the factory floor.


MEETING EXPECTATIONS Smart factory automation engineers have growing expectations of industrial temperature sensors, including smaller size, flexible communications, and remote configurability. This article showed how RTD temperature sensors could be quickly redesigned with a highly integrated AFE to reduce the enclosure size. It also showed how an IO-Link device transceiver allows the sensor to operate independently of the industrial network interface used to connect to a process controller. While this article focuses on RTD-based


temperature sensors, this redesign can also be applied to temperature sensors that use thermistors or thermocouple transducers.


Analog Devices www.analog.com


The MAX14828 is an example of a low power,


ultra-small IO-Link device transceiver. It is available in a (4mm × 4mm) 24-lead TQFN package and a (2.5mm × 2.5mm) wafer-level package (WLP), allowing it to be easily integrated


Figure 5. Implementing the AFE using the AD7124-4


Figure 6. Communication with the industrial network is performed by the IO-Link host transceiver on the controller side MAY 2024 DESIGN SOLUTIONS 25


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60