BSEE-NOV21-PG08.qxp_Layout 1 25/10/2021 11:53 Page 8
BSEE
ENVIRONMENTAL AWARENESS
Targeting zero waste in land development
Amy Jones, associate director, Idom Merebrook, considers the challenges of zero waste targets in recycling land for development, and asks is a remediated site a clean site?
To help preserve our green spaces the UK is committed to developing brownfield sites as a priority. However, dealing with the regeneration and repurposing of brownfield land ready for development can be problematic and costly.
T
Most brownfield sites have physical health hazards, such as uncovered holes and unsafe structures. And, with former industrial sites there can also be a risk of chemical contamination and polluted ground water.
According to Amy Jones, leading environmental engineer at Idom Merebrook one of the most challenging aspects of land remediation is waste management. She commented: "Urban planners and developers typically inherit a land legacy of old industrial plants, factories, power stations, gas works and petrochemical sites. Before any development can be considered the land must be made safe and fit for purpose through remediation. “On brownfield sites being redeveloped the disposal of waste soils often amounts to significant costs, which are often not fully accounted for during the preconstruction phase. An efficient materials
management strategy can be a silver bullet in reducing the amount and cost of waste - and the earlier that focus begins the better." Identification and management of contaminated waste on brownfield sites, can save construction projects both time and money as well as mitigating environmental impact. Early consultation and
understanding of the contractor risks from both a legal and commercial
8 BUILDING SERVICES & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER NOVEMBER 2021
he race to zero waste is on, and the challenge is perhaps greatest in the construction industry, which is also one of the country’s largest
producers of waste.
standpoint will help reduce the risks associated with ground works during the construction phase.
Understanding the quality of the site investigation and identifying weaknesses within a report can mitigate programme delays and the impact of costs associated with disposal by preferentially removing lower rate materials.
Amy identified three areas of focus for ground engineers working on brownfield sites; the first consideration is what are the proposed remediation solutions? We need to consider the physical removal of old structures, utilising a clean cover system and ensuring gas protection and treatment; we also need to consider whether these measures satisfy the local authority stipulations.
The second area of focus is waste assessment – have soils been considered within their waste category? Basic classification determines the type of waste and Waste Acceptance Criteria determines whether it can be accepted into specific waste facilities. This should be considered before planning submission
therefore reducing the amount of materials to be removed within legal parameters.
Lastly, proper consideration needs to be given to health and safety requirements for the public, site operatives and end-users; this may include checking for asbestos in soil, general site contamination and ground gases.
Amy continued: "Zero waste on site is something of a holy grail…and a remediated site does not necessarily mean it is a clean site or that the material on site is inert, with regards to waste categories.
It means that it is fit for purpose and that materials can be left in-situ with a hard standing or clean cover system in place, which breaks the exposure pathway to the end user, depending on the assessment criteria used (residential, public open space or commercial) the material could still be classed as hazardous waste.
A common misunderstanding with contaminated land is that soils cannot be reused and must be disposed of as hazardous waste. This, however, is not the case as it is often possible for soil to be
reengineered and reused – even if there is contamination present. One of the main goals for any developer is reducing the volume materials being removed from site. This can be achieved by either following the waste hierarchy of reduce, reuse, recycle, repurpose and disposal as a last resort – assessing material to determine if it is inert, non-hazardous or hazardous for appropriate handling and disposal. Amy added: "At Idom Merebrook we are increasingly asked to assess, plan and manage the
redevelopment of brownfield sites, which offers an opportunity to both enhance the surroundings, preserve green spaces and boost the local economy.
For the developer a sustainable waste management strategy is key to unlocking the benefits of best practice. These include income generation through collection of materials for reuse, reduced waste disposal costs at landfill, reduced costs through purchasing fewer materials, fewer accidents on-site through correct materials storage and regulatory compliance with duty of care requirements."
Redevelopment of brownfield sites is very important for the UK’s Sustainable Development Strategy because not only does it clean up environmental health hazards and eyesores but enables regeneration within a community. Communities often place high importance on these sites and prefer to see them reused for projects including affordable housing, community projects and creating work opportunities. Development projects are more likely to get permission for redevelopment on a brownfield site than on a Greenfield site.
Read the latest at:
www.bsee.co.uk
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50
