search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
DATA CENTRES & CABLE MANAGEMENT


Cable gland ideas for the EMC directive


The EMC Directive is a European regulation to enforce limitations on all electrical and electronic equipment that may cause or be affected by electromagnetic interference (EMI). While cable glands are not directly covered by it, Lee Frizzell, technical director of CMP Products discusses why they should be an important consideration for system designers despite them neither emitting EMI or being susceptible to it


T


he EMC (Electromagnetic Compatibility) of equipment used in the design of electrical and electronic systems is of huge importance in any installation – and nowhere is that more the


case than in data centres, where a power outage or equipment malfunction could be cataclysmic. Also referred to as Radio Frequency


Interference (RFI) or noise, EMI is a disturbance in the magnetic field surrounding the equipment that can affect electrical or electronic circuits in the vicinity. It’s commonly generated in automation utilising drives, motors and transmitters and the problems caused by it can include over-voltage, under-voltage, or transients, all of which can lead to the degradation of the circuit. In data centres, power sources tend to


produce low-frequency EMI, which can damage hardware, corrupt data, and even wipe out an entire hard drive. Cables near EMI sources, unless properly protected, are exposed to currents, and can suffer a surge in voltage. It’s the high-voltage current that then generates electrical noise, which interferes with data and voice applications that the cabling supports. Because there are so many different types of data centre, the Uptime Institute in the US developed the Tier Standard, which the UK and most of the world have adopted. This evaluates the quality and reliability of data centres and provides guidance on the level of EMI protection needed.


Hewlett Packard outlines the tiers like this:


• Tier 1: Has a single path for power and cooling and few, if any, redundant and backup components. It has an expected uptime of 99.671% (28.8 hours of downtime annually).


• Tier 2: Has a single path for power and cooling and some redundant and backup components. It has an expected uptime of 99.741% (22 hours of downtime annually).


• Tier 3: Has multiple paths for power and cooling and systems in place to update and maintain it without taking it offline. It has an expected uptime of 99.982% (1.6 hours of downtime annually).


• Tier 4: Built to be completely fault tolerant and has redundancy for every component. It has an expected uptime of 99.995% (26.3 minutes of downtime annually).


CMP’s TruSeal TSZ cable gland


Each tier contains the required components of all the tiers below it, with design rules coming into play for Tiers 3 and 4 to address potential threats to uptime of the systems. Shielding is proven as the best protection against EMI and is of greatest importance in higher-tier data centres. This is the practice of surrounding electronics and cables with conductive or magnetic materials, which protect against incoming or outgoing emissions of electromagnetic frequencies. Legislative safety standards and directives have long been established to ensure that the environment, equipment, and machinery are properly shielded, with the key initiative being the European Union EMC Directive. Originally enacted in 1989 under the Directive 89/336/ EEC, the EMC Directive has witnessed significant development since it first came into force. It has been amended several times since then; the latest being in 2016, when the new EMC 2014/30/EU Directive became effective. The EMC Directive requires that products must not generate unwanted electromagnetic pollution or interference and that products must be immune to a reasonable amount of noise pollution or interference. EMC testing is required to be carried out on any electrical or electronic


Read the latest at: www.bsee.co.uk


Graph shows noise reduction when using a CMP TSZ grounded cable gland vs an ungrounded cable gland. Both EMC tests used identical shielded cables


product that may either cause electromagnetic radiation or be affected by it. The directive means equipment manufacturers must make considerations early in the electrical and electronic design process to ensure the equipment will pass EMC test requirements. Many design techniques are therefore adopted to limit EMI emissions at source or to protect susceptible equipment. Circuits may be partitioned, segregating EMC critical and non-critical areas. A good grounding scheme may be implemented, preventing earth loops leading to unwanted signals being radiated. Shielded cables and enclosures are often utilised, providing barriers to unwanted radiated noise. However, a significant oversight is often found at the point of cable entry into an electrical enclosure. By adding openings in enclosures, pathways are created to allow noise to breach the shielded enclosure. Unterminated or poorly terminated cable shields can allow noise to be carried into the enclosures, acting as antennas to radiate noise onto sensitive circuits. Grounding the cable shield effectively inside a cable gland at point of entry eliminates a potential noise pathway and reduces the risks of radiated emissions being carried into the enclosure. Cable glands, which employ a robust 360-degree circumferential termination of the cable screen, shield braid or armour (e.g. with a cone and clamping ring, or a dedicated


continuity device) in their metallic body, contribute to the electromagnetic compatibility of installations through reliable low impedance connections. Statistics are backed up by a number of industry studies into the role they can play in EMC protection.


One such independent study was commissioned by ourselves in 2021 and carried out by a third party, Eurofins E&E. 3 Metre Class B Radiated Emission Measurement tests were carried out in accordance with EN 55032, to gauge the performance of cable glands terminated onto screened, braid shielded and armoured cables. The results proved categorically that using a reliable, 360-degree termination of the shield or metallic cable layer inside the cable gland improved noise attenuation throughout the frequency range. When it comes to improving electrical safety, whether it be with the intention of protecting people, power supplies or data, it’s imperative that every potential step is taken to ensure the systems are the most robust they possibly can be. As such, suitably proven cable glands need to be given proper consideration – and if this can be done within the remit of the EMC Directive then it would ensure they are.” CMP’s TruSeal TSZ cable glands are designed for superior EMC performance, providing 360 degrees contact around screen circumference. CMP cable glands have been third party tested, proving they can attenuate EMI across a wide range of frequencies.


In production 2 – machine face at CMP BUILDING SERVICES & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER AUGUST 2024 7


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42