Connectors & cables
Connectors for the food industry
Digitalisation over the past decade has meant food and beverage manufacturing and processing has become a highly automated business. The need for fast and reliable electrical connections to prevent machine downtime and disruption on the supply chain is crucial to growing this £121 billion industry. Here Dawn Robinson, European product manager for electrical connector specialist PEI- Genesis, explores the considerations when choosing a connector for food processing.
A
ccording to a Oneserve survey of British manufacturers, three per cent of all working days are lost annually to
machine downtime, equating to almost 50 hours of work and approximately £31,000 per facility. In food and beverage processing, studies
have identified water-damage and corrosion as possible reasons for machine downtime. It is undoubtable then, that every machine component should be carefully considered — electrical connectors are no exception.
InDusTRy cHallEnGEs A case study by cable and connector supplier HARTING found that food and beverage processes are subject to regular water ingress problems with their glands and connectors. This often occurs when connector seals are not able to withstand rigorous cleaning with high-pressure water streams, leading to corrosion from cleaning chemicals, like hydrochloric acid. As a result, the food manufacturer is constantly having to replace the electrical components and seals, resulting in production disruption and mounting repair costs. In addition, recurrent damage to the electrical machine components put the factory at risk of fire. Unfortunately it is not a case of adjusting cleaning
protocols, as they must be thorough to comply with the Food Standards Agency’s Hazardous Analysis of Critical Control Point (HACCP) principles. However, even the most rigorous processes struggle to remove all contaminants. According to tests conducted at the Research Institute of Sciences and Engineering in Sweden, even after hygienic cleaning, levels of bacteria can remain high on food processing machinery. For example, residue can get stuck in dirt
pockets on the hoods of electrical connectors and as a result, bacteria can spread onto the machine areas in direct contact with the food.
20
If bacterial contamination were to occur and product recalls were necessary, not only would it be costly and disruptive, but the health of the consumer would be at risk.
conTamInanT-fREE connEcTIon Specialist engineers are now waking up to the demands of the industry and, as a result, have tailored connector design to address the common issues. So, what design features make a connector suitable for this challenging environment? Firstly, connectors need to be able to transmit
power in areas requiring cleaning with jet water streams and acidic chemicals. This means the hoods and housings must be water-tight, so power transmission is maintained despite rigorous cleaning threatening the electrical interfaces. When choosing a connector, you can look out for IP69K protection, housing approved by the Food and Drug Administration and an ECOLAB certification. For example, the HARTING Han F+B range offers all three. With power connections protected, high production rates can be maintained, preventing disruption to the supply chain. Connectors for food and beverage
processing must also be easy to handle. Ideally, operators should not need to open control cabinets to decouple machinery or call in for an expert to replace parts when the solution is relatively simple — service teams are already under pressure to rectify problems efficiently. Best practice for food manufacturers is therefore to choose a plug and play device, designed for easy and quick changeovers. Regularly replacing and repairing connectors will
eat into production times and costs. By specifying a product that is easy to use, can withstand cleaning processes and has the relevant certifications, manufacturers can reduce machine downtime.
PEI-Genesis
www.peigenesis.com February 2021 Instrumentation Monthly
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74
