search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Data acquisition


capacitance and 5 V power supply. For op amps, IQ (<1 mA per channel) and


noise (<6 nV/√Hz voltage noise density) are key specifications. The precision op amps ADA4522- 2 and ADA4084-2 are good choices, with their features listed in Table 3. For gain resistors, 1.2 kΩ/300 Ω/75 Ω/25 Ω


resistors are chosen to achieve 1/4/16/64 gain. With greater resistance, noise may increase, and with lesser resistance, more power consumption is needed. If another gain configuration is needed, resistors must be carefully chosen to ensure the gain accuracy. A differential input ADC plays the role of


subtractor. The CMRR of the ADC is >100 dB, which can meet the system requirement.


In-Loop CompensatIon CIrCuIt to DrIve LtC2500-32


The AD7768-1 has an integrated precharge amplifier to ease the driving requirement. For SAR ADCs, such as the LTC2500-32, high speed amplifiers are normally suggested for use as the driver. In this DAQ application, the bandwidth


Part Number LTC6915 AD8557 AD8556 AD8250 AD8251


Gain (min) (V/V)


1 28 70 1 1 Part Number AD8422 LT1168 AD8220 AD8224 AD8221


Gain (min) (V/V)


1 1 1 1 1


Gain (max) (V/V)


4096 1300 1280 10 8


Gain (max) (V/V)


1000 10,000 1000 1000 1000


requirement is low. For driving LTC2500-32, an in-loop compensation circuit using the precision amplifier (ADA4084-2) is suggested. Figure 8 shows the in-loop compensation PGIA used to drive the LTC2500-32. The PGIA has the following features:


R22/C14/R30/C5 and R27/C6/R31/C3 are key components to better stability for in- loop compensation circuitry.


With ADG659, A1/A0 = 00, gain = 1, and the feedback path of the upper amplifier is amplifier out ➞R22 ➞R30 ➞S1A ➞ DA ➞R6 ➞AMP —IN.


amplifier out ➞R22 ➞R8 ➞R10 ➞R12 ➞S4A ➞DA ➞R6 ➞AMP —IN. The PGIA is connected to LTC2500-32EVB to


With ADG659, A1/A0 = 11, gain = 64, and the feedback path of the upper amplifier is


verify the performance. Different passive component (R22/C14/R30/C5 and


IQ/Amp (max)


(mA) 1.6


1.8 2.7 4.5 4.5 Table 1. Digital PGIAs


IQ/Amp (max))


300 µA 530 µA 750 µA 800 µA 1 mA


VS Span (min)


(V) 4.6


4.6 4.5 4.5 4.6 Table 2. Instrumentation Amplifiers Device


ADA4522-2 ADA4084-2


(max) (µV) VOS 5 100


IBIAS (max)


150 pA 250 nA


GBP (typ) (MHz) 2.7 15.9


0.1 Hz to 10 Hz


(typ) (nV p-p) 117 100


VNOISE


VNOISE Density (typ) (nV/√Hz)


5.8 3.9


Current Noise Density (typ)


(fA/√Hz)


800 550


Table 3. Low Noise, Low Power Operational Amplifiers 48 September 2021 Instrumentation Monthly (typ) (µA) IQ/Amp


830 625


VS Span (min) (V)


4.5 3


(max) (V) VS Span


55 30


VS Span (max)


(V) 36


40 36 36 36


Input Voltage Noise (typ)


(nV/√Hz) 8


10 14 14 8


VS Span (min)


(V) 2.7


2.7 5 10 10


VS Span (max)


(V) 11


5.5 5.5 30 34


Input Voltage Noise (typ)


(nV/√Hz) 50


32 32 18 18 Figure 7. Block diagram of a discrete PGIA.


R27/C6/R31/C3) values are tried to reach better THD and noise performance at different gain (1/4/16/64). The final components values are: R22/R27 = 100 Ω, C14/C6 = 1 nF, R30/R31 = 1.2 kΩ, C3/C5 = 0.22 µF. The measured 3 dB BW at gain = 1 below PGIA is about 16 kHz.


BenCh evaLuatIon setup


To test the noise, THD, and CMRR performance, a discrete ADA4084-2 PGIA and AD7768-1 board were made as a total solution. This solution is compatible with the EVAL-AD7768-1 evaluation board, so it can interface with the control board SDP-H1. Thus, the EVAL- AD7768FMCZ software GUI can be used to gather and analyse data. The ADA4084-2 PGIA and LTC2500-32


board is designed as an alternative total solution. The board interfaces to the SDP-H1 controller board, which is controlled by the LTC2500- 32FMCZ software GUI. In both boards, the PGIA’s gain is designed


as 1/2/4/8/16, which is different from what is shown in Figure 8. Table 5 shows the evaluation results for these two boards.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74