search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
ATIEL & UEIL Joint Sustainability Committee


to establish systems for collecting, cleaning, and returning reusable packaging to remain compliant.


Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR): The PPWR expands EPR schemes, making producers of lubricants responsible for the full lifecycle of their packaging, from production through to recovery and recycling. Lubricant manufacturers will be required to finance and manage the collection and processing of packaging waste, particularly focusing on harder-to-recycle industrial packaging like IBCs and drums.


For further details, please refer to the official PPWR documentation.


7.3 Packaging Challenges, Innovations and Best Practices This section outlines key characteristics, challenges, and innovations for various types of lubricant packaging, offering best practices to address these issues sustainably. The following table provides a comparison of plastic containers, metal drums, and Intermediate Bulk Containers (IBCs), illustrating the specific attributes, challenges and solutions for each packaging type.


Plastic Containers Metal Drums • Lightweight


• Medium durability


Characteristics


• Convenience features like nozzles and handles.


• Contamination


• Often designed for single-use thus contributing to waste.


Challenges


• Multi-layer designs for barrier properties; can complicate recycling.


Innovations


• Transition to Post-Consumer Recycled (PCR) plastic


• Contamination • cleaning costs


• Energy-intensive recycling


• End-of-life management issues if not part of reuse systems.


• Drum reconditioning programs


• High strength • Very high durability • Reusable


Intermediate Bulk Containers (IBCs)


• Very high durability


• High volume efficiency


• modular design for part replacement.


• reusable


• Contamination • cleaning costs


• complex recycling of mixed materials.


• Closed-loop systems for reconditioning and reuse


Version 11.06.2025 © ATIEL and UEIL Lubricants & Greases End of Life, Sustainable Best Practices


Page 20 of 42


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42