search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
APPLIED ECONOMICS AND POLICY


CEO Succession Roulette Management Science, 69, 10, October 2023 LINK TO PAPER LINK TO VIDEO


DRAGANA CVIJANOVIC ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR


Cornell Peter and Stephanie Nolan School of Hotel Adminstration


Cornell SC Johnson College of Business Cornell University


Co-authors • Dragana Cvijanovic


Associate Professor, Cornell Peter and Stephanie Nolan


School of Hotel Administration, Cornell SC Johnson College of Business, Cornell University


• Nickolay Gantchev, Warwick Business School, University of Warwick • Rachel Li, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission


Summary


Despite intense scrutiny from investors, markets, and regulators, many public companies have no formal succession plans, even though this is a key respon- sibility of corporate boards. Te Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) views poor succession planning as “a significant business risk,” and anecdotal evidence links succession risk to significant value destruction. Yet limited ac- ademic research exists evaluating the effects of succession planning on chief executive officer (CEO) turnover outcomes.


In this paper, Cvijanovic et al. study the effects of formal succession planning on leadership stability and the efficiency of CEO turnover decisions. Using hand-collected data from regulatory filings to identify a firm’s first disclosure of a succession plan and manually verifying whether subsequent turnover events adhere to the pre-disclosed succession guidelines, they provide evi- dence that succession planning reduces the cost of management transitions by improving their efficiency, reducing the likelihood of forced CEO turnovers and uncertainty around transitions, the incidence of interim CEO appoint- ments, and the frequency of non-CEO executive departures. Teir results also demonstrate a positive impact of succession planning by improving the quali- ty of the match between the firm and the incoming CEO. Succession planning also helps CEO dismissal decisions by raising the board’s preparedness to remove an underperforming CEO.


TO IMPACT CONTENTS


RESEARCH WITH IMPACT: CORNELL SC JOHNSON COLLEGE OF BUSINESS • 2023 EDITION


17


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113