search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Insights > Construction


most of the twentieth century, through war, economic calamity, and back again, council homes have occupied a hallowed place in Britain’s urban fabric. By the 1970s, housing associations and local authorities were putting up over 300,000 a year, some blocky and semi-detached, but many others soaring with architectural enthusiasm. And whatever their aesthetics, they were places, proclaimed Nye Bevan, where “the working man, the doctor and the clergyman will live in close proximity to each other”. And live they did – on the eve of Margaret Thatcher's election, 42% of the country’s population came home to houses built by the state. Yet over the last 40 years, Britain’s stock of social accommodation has withered. Between the selling off of properties via Right to Buy, a decline in council funding for new projects, and broader attitudes about council estates as ugly and squalid, that 42% figure in 1979 has slumped to below 10%. There is little architecture, as a profession, can do about those first two points. Yet on the third, from London to the Midlands, practitioners are proving their worth, dragging social housing design away from the cliches and failures that dominated the twentieth century.


Flatlining


For someone raised in the shadow of Thatcherism, it’s hard to remember just how popular council housing once was in Britain. More to the point, it’s hard to remember just how popular it was to design. Not so for Simon Fraser. A partner at Fraser Brown Mackenna Architects, he’s old enough to recall when social housing was dynamic, exciting. Think of the


20


Southgate Estate, near Liverpool, he says. Designed by James Stirling, and unveiled in 1977, it was a “masterpiece” of modernist architecture, all round windows and multicoloured tiling. Peter Barber, founder of Peter Barber Architects, makes a similar point. He highlights the work of people like Sydney Cook, council architect for the Borough of Camden in the 1960s, who took simple concrete and made it beautiful. You can still see that ambition now, at places like Alexander and Ainsworth Estate on Rowley Way, with its ascending ziggurat terraces, red pavements and plants jumping up like between the doorways. Completed in 1978 by Neave Brown, it was the first council estate to be grade II listed, described by then Heritage Secretary, Peter Brooke, as “one of the most distinguished groups of buildings in England since the Second World War”.


Not all post-war council housing has proved successful. Spurred on by the utopianism of theorists like Le Corbusier, some areas saw the construction of looming tower blocks, strong on floating passageways but light on practicality. The Southgate Estate is typical here. A stylistic marvel it may have been, but tenants weren’t interested in living in a place they dismissed as “Legoland”. The project was abandoned in 1990. More to the point, similar problems still haunt parts of Britain today. “We have chosen to demolish one high rise block due to its configuration and the fire risk involved,” notes Mark Lowe, Nottingham council’s head of regeneration and housing delivery. Lowe and his team have also had to bulldoze several more blocks at Lenton, west of Nottingham’s centre, because


they were built inefficiently, making upkeep too expensive. You get the sense, too, that failures like Southgate helped bring down the good name of social housing generally. Beyond negative perceptions around council housing, however, its decline really began in 1980, with the Thatcher government’s ‘Right to Buy’ scheme. Now allowed to buy out their tenancy – and offered discounts of up to 70% for the privilege – countless families snapped up the deal of a lifetime. By 1987, over one million council properties across the UK had been sold off. To make matters worse, councils didn’t even get the proceeds from the bonanza to build new houses, the money instead going straight to the Treasury. In a society where council housing was quickly disappearing, and where the stock that did remain was often tarred as inadequate, many architects unsurprisingly found their enthusiasm for new builds waning.


A social network


If you know where to look, you can find a little wedge of old England in the sweaty heart of modern London. You’ll find it on Holmes Road, in Camden, snug between a Catholic primary school and a Victorian townhouse. Step through the black gate by the pavement and they’re there – two rows of almshouses, prised gently from the tenth century, with the same porthole windows and the same rough brick walls. The only sign, perhaps, that the Holmes Road development isn’t actually from a more sombre age are its doors. In red and blue and orange, they’d probably have been too bright for Alfred or Aethelstan.


Just as well. In their human proportions, fitting like a jigsaw


piece into the cityscape beyond, the Holmes Road cottages are supremely contemporary. Funded by Camden Council to offer accommodation for the homeless, and completed by Peter Barber Architects in 2019, the project is just one example in a torrent of new social housing projects across the UK. Barber describes the avalanche as a movement – one that proclaims “a more dense, repacked, conventional form of urbanism”. Spurred on by a supply crisis that’s launched house prices to the stratosphere, leaving millions of people stuck renting in the private sector, Barber’s revolution has plenty of followers. In the Buckinghamshire town of Aylesbury, for instance, Simon Fraser and his colleagues recently finished a row of miniature social houses. Known as Gatehouse Road, the development is built from a series of repurposed shipping containers.


Though they’re aesthetically distinct, both the Camden and Aylesbury projects in fact share much. First there’s location. The London development squeezed 59 units into the back streets of Camden, even leaving space for a communal garden. Gatehouse Road, for its part, was built on a narrow patch of wasteland that once hosted garages. Then there’s scale. Forced by necessity to abandon the vaulting ambition of Le Corbusier and his disciples, Barber and Fraser kept their gaze lower. One of the joys of projects like Holmes Road, he says, is that it forces him to wriggle out solutions – he says he sometimes feels like an “escapologist” – that fit elegantly into the existing urban landscape. Whether it’s broadening a square, or opening up a new thoroughfare behind houses, Barber adds that a public-spirited approach


LEAF REVIEW / www.leading-architects.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41