search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
MEDICAL DEVICES


New UK medical device regulation spells potential trial concerns for some IVD players


Forthcoming UK medical device regulations have an uncertain date but draw some praise along with caution, says Jennifer Smith-Parker.


T


he anticipation of new medical device- related regulations in the UK has led to some concerns that additional pre-


market clinical or post-market surveillance data would be overly burdensome. As GlobalData found, the additional data


 challenge for smaller in vitro diagnostics (IVD) manufacturers whose market is essentially only in the EU, says Andrew S Thompson, PhD, director of therapy research & analysis at GlobalData. However, the requirement for additional clinical data is not that big a shock to most device manufacturers, says Eamonn McGowran, associate director for regulatory affairs at Boyds consultants. The UK’s exit from the EU has meant the area is not beholden to the new European Medical Device Regulation (MDR), which has replaced the current Medical Devices Directive (MDD). UK law still relies on the less-rigorous MDD as the basis for medical device marketing rules. Thus, neither the MDR nor companion rules like the In Vitro Diagnostics Regulation (IVDR) will have a direct effect on the availability of medical devices in the UK.


The EU MDR and IVDR regulations became effective in May 2017 but to allow time for companies to acclimate to the new requirements, the regulations became applicable over a transition period. The MDR had originally provided a three-year transition period (becoming operational in May 2020), however, due to COVID-19 full application of the MDR was extended to 26 May 2021. Similarly, the IVDR became fully applicable 


transition period.


 IVD sector adjusting to the regulation, the Europeans published a proposal to postpone the full application deadline.


British regulation will tighten up At some point, the UK will also likely introduce new medical device regulations, based on the  which reported on the harmful effects of some medicines, interventions and devices on female health, explains Thompson. The British government is likely to continue to consult with medical device stakeholders such as manufacturers, healthcare providers and patient advocacy groups, to develop these new regulations. “The UK has always had a strong role


in device development and regulation,” McGowran says. Amendments to create the new regime are scheduled to be in force at the beginning of July 2023. This will align with the date from which the UK is due to stop accepting CE-marked medical devices in Great Britain and will require the use of the UK Conformity Assessed marking (1 July 2023). The EU MDR has brought regulatory requirements for devices to a higher standard  previously used for devices has changed, explains McGowran. It would seem the UK could likewise raise the standards in its own consultation process in order to maintain  own regulatory bubble,” Thompson says. Such changes will be felt across the industry.


Outsourcing in Clinical Trials Handbook | 65


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100