search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
FOCUS 071 Project


McDonald’s Brussels


FOLLOWING A SUCCESSFUL launch of a sustainable design approach in McDonald’s restaurants in Carbonne and La Guerche de Bretagne, France, WeWantMore developed a new scheme for the brand’s branch in Bourse, Brussels. As McDonald’s works to meet its 2050 net-zero target, the team commissioned the studio to once again create a sustainable design for its dining areas, focused on decor circularity.


Antwerp-based WeWantMore worked closely with McDonald’s to create a dining area experience that would exist not just as a one-off restaurant, but one that could be scaled to other McDonald’s outlets around the world. Tis was developed by a measurement index together with the sustainability consultancy Anthesis, which tracks the circularity of the company’s global restaurant décor. Te sustainable design of the restaurants significantly improves McDonald’s scores on the indicator with a focus on simplicity and disassembly. WeWantMore strived to simplify the material palette towards the use of monomaterials, and the décor built for this restaurant model can easily be taken apart. Pieces are held together using mechanical fixings, instead of glue, so local teams can more effectively break restaurant features down by raw material type, with the goal of recycling or reusing. It says this process is more sustainable than the alternative because metals or woods treated with certain laminates or glues are not designed for re-use. Other sustainable features of the new pilot restaurants included the removal of powder coating from all furniture and décor elements to facilitate greater reuse of steel components in the future, and the removal of laminates – which are notoriously challenging to recycle – from all furniture and décor elements.


Over 80% of the wood used is PEFC certified, from the tree to the restaurant, while 100% of the plastic used in tabletops and low stools, and at least 80% of the plastic used in chairs, is recycled content. Te floor is also 70% cradle-to-cradle certified and the ceiling 100% certified. Stephen Douglas, vice president of global restaurant design at McDonald’s, says: ‘Our new McDonald’s restaurant design bridges creativity and sustainability through a focus on décor circularity, elevating the way design meets the needs of our customers and employees. Not only does the new décor have a bright, optimistic look, but the circularity principles provide a sunny outlook to the future of how we will be feeding and fostering community.’


Ruud Belmans , creative director at WeWantMore, adds: “With this concept we want to show that sustainable design can be bold and fun and make a huge difference at the same time. Te biggest gains were to be found in selecting the right materials and in engineering the furniture and interior features from scratch while simplifying wherever possible.” wewantmore.studio


Left All of the plastic used in tabletops and low stools, and at least 80% of the plastic used in chairs, is recycled content


Right Ruud Belmans, creative director at WeWantMore, says they wanted ‘to show that sustainable design can be bold and fun and make a huge difference at the same time’


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133