search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
080 DESIGN SEMINAR


Below right Theresa Dowling, editorial director of FX


Below left lapiz lazuli rock. Used as paint pigments for royalty and divinity in early renaissance


Right Abby Connor, managing director of Hop Interiors


THE


EVOLUTION OF COLOUR


With the use of colour initially emerging through the ability to harness natural and vegetable dyes, the later invention of chemicals for the process enabled more vibrant colours and put them within financial reach of all social classes rather than being the sole preserve of royalty or the wealthy.


Now, the signs are for a return to a more natural process due to a greater understanding of the damage that pollutants can cause to our natural reserves and waterways.


Gurvinder Khurana, director at M Moser believes that the human response to colour goes even deeper however: ‘As designers, we have a responsibility when we create, design and use colour. We are essentially impacting someone’s mental state and psychological response to a space. We have to design for benefit, happiness, and positivity, and to encourage the behaviours that clients and businesses and the working population need.’ She says that we are all connected to certain responses to colour and that these sit deep in our DNA. Darwin suggested three main uses of colour in the natural world: attraction (survival of the species); protection (camouflage), and protection (warning). ‘Over time, cultural shifts have altered some of the response,’ adds Khurana. ‘There are variations that have developed around the world now and over time, but there are key elements that will always tie us all together. How we interact with our spaces and respond to the design of our environments is a mix of all of these elements.’


Supported by:


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125