FOCUS 057
Left Personalisation through lighting controls and the ability to vary lighting scenes can trigger an emotional response that supports rather than affects a person’s circadian system
Previous page If we single out the hospitality sector, where circadian lighting is sometimes touted as a silver bullet for issues around jet lag, it’s dificult to ascertain that we can beat tiredness by having the right light in a hotel guestroom
and darkness as other contributing factors (along with lots of other non-lighting factors), and it’s clear that we still have a lot to learn about how circadian lighting can work on a meaningful level.
What does become clear is that we need to move away from talking about circadian lighting as if it’s a design philosophy where one size fits all. A blanket approach to circadian lighting can never be effective as we need to account for causal factors such as geography, age, health, sleep, diet, work patterns and exercise. Without being fully informed about the individual, we could use light in a way that is detrimental to that person. And if we don’t start to look at circadian systems in a more holistic way, the effect will only ever be emotional stimuli, not the biological response that we’re looking for.
If we single out the hospitality sector, where circadian lighting is sometimes touted as a silver bullet for issues around jet lag, it’s difficult to ascertain that we can beat tiredness by having the right light in a hotel guestroom. It’s certainly possible to make a guest’s experience more comfortable by transitioning illuminance levels through the colour spectrum, but can we make claims about being able to reset or impact a person’s body clock with artificial light?
‘The truth is that claims are frequently made about circadian lighting that don’t talk about the circadian system at all. Often, the term is nothing more than a buzzword and what we’re referring to is tuneable white light or dim-to-warm schemes’
Te answer is that we can, but only if quantity and duration of exposure to light have been considered along with providing the right spectrum of illumination. If a guest is only staying for a couple of nights, the lighting scheme must stimulate the circadian system in a short time frame. And without a deep understanding of that guest, including the time-zone they have arrived from, how long they plan to stay, and when they intend to go to sleep, the lighting response can only go so far.
Perhaps if we envisage a scenario where we have an entire guestroom using full spectrum tuneable white light and the capacity to extract data from the guest to get a full picture of their travel experience, a supporting lighting scene could be triggered in response to this. Tat said, a guest would still require a much higher level of light than is typically provided in a hospitality environment and to be exposed to that level of light for several hours – only then could we even begin to start defining it as a circadian approach in the truest sense.
controls or the ability to vary lighting scenes can trigger an emotional response, but this doesn’t amount to a definition of circadian. For something truly circadian to be achieved, the approach needs to be scientific, and the implementation research based.
In our attempt to get closer to a truer definition of circadian lighting, we need to be clear that affecting someone’s circadian rhythm is different to supporting it. If we listen closely to what leading authorities such as Professor Russell Foster (professor of circadian neuroscience at Oxford University) are saying, we learn that there is a complex relationship between stimulus duration and intensity for entrainment. Te correct level of biological entrainment is upwards of 1,000 lux, which means that the threshold for stimulating or resetting a person’s internal biological clock is higher than we’re led to believe. To put this in context, it’s twice what’s required as standard in an office environment and five to six times what most brand guidelines reference for a hotel scheme. We also need to be aware that the exposure time needed under certain CCT light levels is significantly longer than we think. Add age and prior exposure to light
All of this illustrates why daylight remains so effective at reducing jet lag. When it comes to anything relating to wellbeing, we should always be talking about natural light first. Daylight is the best possible circadian stimulus and will do everything we need if we’re suffering from the effects of jet lag or tiredness.
To get closer to a true understanding of circadian lighting, we need to be honest about the fact that it goes way beyond warm and cool light. If all we are doing is augmenting daylight in the morning and daytime with tuneable white light, we’re guilty of an element of trickery that plays on a person’s psychological rather than physiological perception of light.
As an industry, we must demystify what we mean by circadian lighting and move away from reductive definitions. If we do this, we’ll be able to start having more honest conversations about lighting considerations for health, wellbeing and productivity. Conversations that take into account a person’s whole 24 hours and their exposure to light alongside other factors that influence an individual’s physiological condition.
Paul Nulty is the founder of
independent lighting consultant Nulty
Designers also need to take responsibility for educating the industry and putting more scientific-based information out there, along with realistic claims about what can be achieved on a project. It’s time to debunk the myths and start using the term circadian correctly. Right now, ‘circadian-ish’ is perhaps the best we have.
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125
