search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
DATA & DIGITAL | TECHNICAL


Skt. Jørgens sø Kødbyen


Det Ny Teter Vesterbrogade


Gasværksvej Halmtorvet


Cabinn City Hotel


Kalvebod Brygge Pumpestation


20m deep Skybrudstunnel


1250m long Above, figure 2: The tunnel in section


This innovative approach results in an increased


output quality and consistency as well as time and cost savings. The tool has been applied on more than 10 projects, including a project in Canada as described by Boye et al (2021). Similar tools have also been developed for other aspects of tunnel design including automatic drawing production.


PROJECT OVERVIEW Jacobs is part of the group of consultants on this project with NIRAS being the lead consultant. The client is HOFOR (Greater Copenhagen Utility) and Fredriskberg Forsyning. The need for this flood alleviation project was brought


about by flooding events in the Danish capital. Over several years, HOFOR will be constructing a number of cloudburst storage and flow diversion tunnels to help protect the city against flooding. One of the tunnel projects is the Kalvebod Brygge Skybrudstunnel. It will convey runoff collected from existing nearby sewers to a large pumping station for discharge into Copenhagen harbour. The Kalvebod Brygge Skybrudstunnel is composed of


two sections (see Figures 1 & 2): ● The section between Skt Jørgens Lake (JØR shaft) and Søner Blvd (SB) shaft, is 2m i.d. and 725m long. The depth of tunnel below ground along this section is approximately 12m to 17m (depth to crown).


● The section between SB shaft and Kalv pumping station, near Copenhagen harbour, is 3m i.d. and 540m long. Depth of tunnel in this section is approximately 11m to 12m (depth to crown).


The Kalv pumping station was designed by Jacobs. SB and JØR shafts were designed in parallel by NIRAS.


Based on information from ground investigations,


the tunnel face is mostly located in glacially disturbed Upper Copenhagen Limestone (UCL). In the area of the proposed tunnel and shafts, UCL is typically overlain by Greensand (sand and limestone); Lower/middle meltwater (sand); Lower clay; Upper clay; and, fill/post glacial deposits. This project is highly complex due to its ambitious


size and planned pumping capacities. But the Kalvebod Tunnel project also traverses a


highly urbanised area with many buildings of historic and cultural significance as well as important existing infrastructure, such as a busy railway line and a metro line. Due to the location of the tunnel and the existing


buildings and infrastructure above, the project required establishing a building damage assessment procedure. This work included pre-assessment of 40No. buildings above the tunnel centreline, most of which have been classed as heritage buildings for conservation.


TYPICAL METHODS OF SETTLEMENT AND IMPACT ANALYSIS Typical methods to determine magnitudes of tunnel settlement and building impact analysis involve data management using Excel spreadsheets and other commercially available software tools. These methods often have only limited integration with CAD software and also are limited in their data handling capacity in dealing with large terrains with thousands of buildings. Often numerous spreadsheets are required and


manually plotting the settlement contour lines in a CAD package. Furthermore, there is often a need to combine settlements from multiple underground structures


December 2023 | 27


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53