The Konecranes Gottwald series is a complete range of versatile, moveable cranes to handle cargo on vessels up to the Super post-Panamax class.
trades or brownfield sites where infrastructure constraints exist. “In scenarios where the port owner opts not to build an extremely robust structure – such as those required for STS operations – the capital expenditure for an LHM is significantly lower,” he adds. Furthermore, if future cargo volumes are uncertain or there is potential for a shift from container handling to bulk, heavy lift or even exceptionally large project cargo, an LHM provides the versatility to adapt without major reinvestment. Electric drive systems enable locally emission-free operation where shore power is available, supporting sustainability goals without compromising performance. Conversely, Liebherr notes that an STS crane becomes the logical investment when ship productivity and high container throughput are the main objectives. “STS cranes deliver the fastest box rates, superior cycle consistency in challenging conditions, and structural stiffness that supports semi- automation, tandem or twin-lift and advanced anti-sway systems,” says Haugner. For deep-sea hubs and high-volume
gateways handling ultra-large container vessels, the business case typically favours STS cranes, given their bespoke geometry for outreach, lift height and back reach, as well as availability rates approaching 99.6%. “In many ports, a balanced fleet strategy is common – pairing STS cranes at mainline berths with LHMs to manage feeder, bulk or breakbulk operations and to provide resilience during peak periods or maintenance downtime,” he adds.
Key differentiators
Liebherr’s mobile harbour cranes are defined by their hydrostatic drive concept, which delivers precise load control and smooth operation while reducing mechanical complexity. “This system supports high
efficiency across all cargo types, including containers, bulk, heavy lift and exceptionally large project cargo,” says Haugner. Another differentiator is the integration
of Pactronic 2.0, a hybrid energy storage system that provides additional lifting power without increasing engine size, enabling faster cycles and improved energy performance. Electrification is a core offering for Liebherr, with factory installed electric drive systems delivering locally emission-free operation and peak- shaving capabilities for ports with shore power infrastructure. Advanced assistance systems such as SmartGrip and analytics through LiDAT smartApp further enhance operational precision and maintenance planning.
On the STS side, Liebherr cranes feature
rigid lattice structures and low centre of gravity for minimal deflection, ensuring accurate
spreader positioning and energy efficiency. “High availability, semi-automation, energy regeneration and remote access, as well as the new LiSIM ROS simulator, position Liebherr cranes as adaptable, future-ready solutions in a competitive market,” adds Haugner. “Furthermore, Liebherr have built our
reputation on supplying a quality product. This continues to be a cornerstone of the Liebherr product offering across all our product ranges. In addition, our cranes offer exceptional productivity and availability along with low maintenance costs, delivering crane that deliver very competitive life time costs.” For Konecranes, the differentiating factor for its Gottwald MHCs is history and track record. “As the inventor of the MHC concept, which grew subsequently based on its growing understanding of the specific needs in MHC
www.hoistmagazine.com | December 2025 | vii
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79
