INDUSTRY TRENDS
and clearly defined requirements from the beginning are essential. The more a solution is aligned with real operational processes, the more effective and sustainable it will be.” And while cranes are becoming increasingly
Leopold Berthold from Liebherr says the objective is not technology for its own sake, but more predictable, repeatable operations that reduce uncertainty and risk.
but if you are serious about safety, you need genuine real-time tracking that updates in intervals below one second.” PEMA notes that, as reliance on digital
systems increases, cyber resilience becomes part of the broader safety landscape. PEMA’s cyber security guidance emphasises that protecting the availability and integrity of terminal control and information systems is essential for maintaining safe and reliable operations, particularly in automated or remotely supported environments.
Training required
Of course, any safety solution is only successful if the users are fully trained. “User understanding and acceptance are key,” says Trauth. Mi-Jack provides on-site training for
operators and terminal staff through practical, scenario-based sessions and explainers. “Employees do not just learn how to use the system but also understand why it is important. This leads to higher acceptance, correct usage and ultimately a stronger safety culture within the terminal.”
Huisman sees that effective safety depends on well trained operators and maintenance crews who understand how advanced systems behave and why they intervene. It offers structured training programmes, from basic familiarisation to advanced maintenance and diagnostics, combining theory with hands on practice, often at the terminal itself. “This approach builds confidence, improves
correct system usage and ensures that safety features deliver their full value during daily operations,” says Meijer.
xx | May/June 2026 |
www.hoistmagazine.com
Modulift also sees a strong need for continued investment in training and competency development. “Even the best- designed equipment relies on well-trained personnel to use it correctly,” it says. “Regular refresher training, lift planning workshops and familiarity with modular systems can significantly reduce the likelihood of incidents.”
Next steps
PEMA sees further improvements in safety depending on progress in three intertwined areas. Firstly, technology and operations must
remain closely aligned. “PEMA’s collision prevention work makes it clear that technology does not deliver safety on its own,” says Berthold. “Real benefits emerge only when technical solutions are embedded within well- designed operational safety processes.” Secondly, proven risk reduction measures must be applied more consistently across the board. “While many effective non-contact and assistance technologies already exist, clearer baseline expectations and wider adoption would support industry-wide improvement,” he adds. Thirdly, knowledge sharing, guidance and
training remain essential. “These themes are actively discussed within PEMA’s technical committees and will continue to be developed at upcoming industry events,” he says. Trauth believes this must be tailored to the specific needs of the terminal. “A one-size-fits- all approach does not work,” he adds. “Each terminal has unique processes, and safety solutions must reflect that. Close collaboration
intelligent, lasting safety improvements require a holistic approach. “Consistent safety standards, strong safety culture and data driven decision making are essential to fully benefit from modern technology,” says Meijer. “When automation, digital tools and training are aligned, safety becomes more than compliance; it becomes a key enabler of reliable, high performance port operations.” Modulift agrees that, while equipment design plays a critical role, there is much more to improving safety in port lifting operations. “Early engagement between cargo owners, lift planners and equipment suppliers is essential,” it says. “Too often, lifting challenges are addressed late in the project life cycle, leading to compromised solutions on the quayside. Involving lifting specialists at the planning stage allows risks to be engineered out before cargo reaches the port.” Another area for improvement it sees is
standardisation across ports and terminals. Consistent lifting procedures, clear communication protocols and shared best practice help reduce variability and confusion, particularly when crews move between sites or work with international project teams. Finally, the industry must continue to foster a safety first culture, where schedule pressure never overrides safe lifting practices. “Ports that encourage near-miss reporting, proactive risk assessment and continuous improvement are best positioned to handle the increasing complexity of modern cargo operations.”
Huisman sees that effective safety depends on well trained operators and maintenance crews.
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79
