search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
MAIN FEATURE


And so, despite the long-term shock of living in psychologically oppressive environments, people have not yet realised that the building industry has disregarded their mental and physical health. The architectural media are keeping silent on this point, and not putting the blame where it belongs. Either they don’t care or cannot reverse decades of praising such psychologically hostile interiors as wonderful, judged purely on visual style.


RESILIENCE IS MATHEMATICALLY RELATED TO HUMAN-SCALE DESIGN


Resilience is the ability of a working system to withstand perturbations. The degree of resilience is how far a system can be displaced and still bounce back, maybe to a new stable state. The keys to achieving resilience are:


1. Use the biological analogy of multi-scale interlinked systems. 2. Understand how natural structures evolve in time, and enable the system to readjust its functions dynamically.


3. Short-term fixes often create long-term fragility by masking deeper problems! 4. A complex system’s resilient limit is fixed by its most fragile subsystem. 5. Narrow efficiencies create fragility, so we need built-in redundancy. 6. Human and urban systems work far from equilibrium; therefore, a neat appearance is misleading. 7. A resilient living system has an infinite variety, and many more connections compared to 20th cities.


-century


Ordered city geometry that is built today is meaningless for energy cycles. Resilient networks contain inherent diversity and redundancy, with optimal cooperation among their subsystems, yet they avoid optimisation (maximum efficiency) for any single process. They require a continuous input of energy in order to function, with energy cycles running simultaneously on many different scales.


Short-term urban fixes only wish to perpetuate the extractive model of cities, not to correct its underlying long-term fragility! Today’s power-driven culture of glass and steel skyscrapers typically focuses upon a single efficiency, and ignores everything else. Twentieth-century architects and planners optimised city morphology strictly for fast automobile traffic.


Resilience comes from linked processes and structures working on many different scales. Solutions are found in self-built spontaneous settlements and in traditional cities. Historic evolution took place towards healthier environments through biophilia and design patterns, but the city form, as decided by design ideology linked to power, cannot re-configure into a new system. By worshipping ‘images of the future’, society doesn’t reuse older successful solutions, and this limitation prevents resilient systems from forming.


ENERGY POLICY COULD RESET UNSUSTAINABLE URBANISM We learn how cities actually function by following their energy flowsxxv


. How are buildings fed with energy,


and how much embedded energy did they cost to erect and maintain? Construction projects conceived and marketed purely as giant sculptures obscure these points. Spendthrift nations with vast fossil energy reserves that construct glass towers in the desert set a poor precedent. Other nations copy this profligate practice just to keep up with a wasteful architectural fashion.


6


AnnaTamila/Shutterstock.com


7


united photo studio/Shutterstock.com FUTURARC 51


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119