search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
ALL THINGS LICENSING


Better informed regulators generally lead to better informed decision-making. That provides benefits not only for authorities but also for the trade itself, creating greater consistency, transparency and confidence in the regulatory process.


A professional conduct framework


For taxi licensing specifically, it could provide officers with a stronger grounding in areas such as:


l Driver suitability assessments l Enforcement powers l Safeguarding l Disability awareness obligations l Licensing policy development l Committee processes l Evidence gathering l Regulatory decision-making l Public law principles


A structured qualification framework would also support recruitment and retention, which remains a significant challenge for many local authorities.


If licensing becomes a recognised professional career with clear development pathways, it becomes easier to attract talented individuals into the sector and provide them with opportunities for progression.


Continuing professional development


The strategy also places significant emphasis on Continuing Professional Development (CPD). The Institute intends to introduce a formal CPD framework and has set a target of achieving 90% CPD compliance among its members. For many professions, mandatory continuing development is simply accepted as part of maintaining competence. Licensing arguably has an equally strong case.


The legislative landscape changes continually. In the taxi world alone, recent years have seen developments around safeguarding expectations, national standards, immigration checks, disability access duties, infor- mation sharing, medical standards, vehicle emissions, fraud prevention and emerging technologies.


No licensing officer can rely solely on knowledge acquired years earlier. Likewise, drivers and operators benefit when licensing authorities are supported by well-trained officers who remain current with legislation, case law and best practice.


PHTM NOVEMBER 2026


Alongside qualifications and CPD, the strategy proposes the introduction of a professional conduct framework. Although details will develop over time, the principle is significant. Licensing professionals exercise considerable influence over matters affecting liveli- hoods, businesses and public safety. Public confidence depends not only upon technical competence but also integrity, objectivity and ethical conduct.


The introduction of recognised professional standards helps reinforce those expectations. Importantly, this should not be viewed as something that exists purely for practitioners.


High professional standards within licensing authorities help drive higher standards across the industries and sectors being regulated. If we expect taxi drivers and operators to meet rigorous standards of conduct, professionalism and compliance, it is entirely reasonable that regulators hold themselves to similarly high standards.


A stronger voice for licensing


Another notable aspect of the strategy is the Institute’s commitment to expanding its policy and research role. Plans include increased engagement with govern- ment, parliament and stakeholders alongside the production of annual State of Licensing reports.


This matters because licensing professionals frequently find themselves at the sharp end of emerging public policy challenges.


The taxi sector provides numerous examples. Issues such as vehicle accessibility, safeguarding, vehicle standards, cross-border hiring, operator models, autonomous technology and national consistency continue to generate debate across local and national government.


The profession benefits from having a strong, credible and respected body capable of bringing practical frontline experience into national policy discussions.


The IoL’s ambition to strengthen that voice should therefore be welcomed by licensing practitioners and responsible members of the trade alike.


71


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82