search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
THE IRISH LOOP


l Transfer pricing and value creation need to be properly documented, not sketched on the back of a menu.


For private hire, this might mean actually having people in Ireland performing tech, admin, or management services if that’s what the paperwork says. A “brass plate” company that does nothing but issue an annual invoice to your UK firm is asking for trouble.


2. “Everyone else is doing it” is no defence


Because the Irish Loop is now a recognised pattern, HMRC can compare cases:


l If one operator has a robust, well evidenced arrangement and another has a paper thin copy, the second is exposed.


l The existence of compliant examples does not protect weaker ones; in fact, it can highlight where yours falls short.


For private hire bosses, this means:


l Don’t assume that because a competitor boasts about an Irish structure, it is either safe or suitable for you.


l Don’t rely on generic marketing material from scheme promoters. Insist on tailored, written advice from a regulated professional who understands your specific business.


Remember: HMRC’s job is to collect the right tax, not to level the playing field between operators. If your version of the Irish Loop doesn’t stack up, pointing at someone else’s won’t help.


3. HMRC may accept the structure but still challenge the numbers


Another key implication is that tax authorities can:


l Accept the broad shape of an Irish Loop structure, yet


l Still dispute how much profit is shifted, which company should bear particular costs, or how prices are set between UK and Irish entities.


For private hire operators this could show up as:


l Disputes over the level of platform or management fees charged by the Irish company


PHTM JULY 2026


l Arguments about whether key decisions are really taken in the UK rather than Ireland


l Questions around whether driver or customer facing functions (which create much of the value) are properly rewarded in the UK


In other words, even where the model is not torn up, the tax saving may be reduced or removed by an adjustment, potentially years after the fact and with interest and penalties on top.


Practical steps for operators considering (or already using) an Irish structure


If any of this rings bells, there are some sensible actions to take:


1. Get independent advice


Speak to a UK tax adviser or solicitor who is not the original promoter of the structure. Ask them to review the arrangement in plain English: what it does, why it works, and where the risks are.


2. Check that reality matches the story


Look at who is really doing what, where. If the Irish company is meant to be running technology, customer service, or management functions, make sure that is actually happening and evidenced.


3. Keep thorough records


Minutes, service agreements, transfer pricing reports, and correspondence should all support the idea that the Irish company is a genuine, profit earning part of the group.


4. Plan for HMRC questions


Assume at some point you may have to explain the structure. Being ready with a clear narrative and supporting paperwork is far better than trying to reconstruct it under pressure.


The bottom line for UK private hire operators is this: the Irish Loop is no longer an obscure idea muttered about at conferences; it is a recognisable pattern that HMRC now has language for and experience with. That doesn’t make it automatically wrong, but it does mean that only well designed, properly implemented versions are likely to stand up to scrutiny.


For everyone else, the promise of quick tax savings may come with a long and expensive tail.


7


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78