search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
KNOW YOUR RIGHTS


in prison? I drive for a living and just want to make sure I don’t fall foul of the law.


A


However if there was no system in place, if the post was just ignored for months, then you may be better off pleading guilty and concentrating on presenting an exceptional hardship argument. When a person accumulates 12 or more points with- in three years, they will be put at risk of a six-month ban. But a ban is not inevitable. The courts can decide not to ban you if they believe that it would cause exceptional hardship. So if you pleaded guilty that is the argument we would concentrate on – explaining the implications that a ban would have.


Q A


How long a ban will I be looking at for driving at 120mph in a 70mph zone? I have a clean licence and no previous convictions.


This speed will be too high for a speed awareness course or a fixed penalty of three points and £100 fine. For speeds that high, the matter will automati- cally proceed to court.


At the court hearing the Magistrates will refer to their sentencing guidelines. In a 70mph limit: • For speeds between 71-90mph you would be looking at 3 points.


• For speeds between 91-100mph, you would receive 4-6 points or a ban of 7-28 days.


• For speeds of 101mph and above, the guidelines recommend either 6 points or a ban of 7-56 days, or even longer if they consider the speed to be ‘grossly in excess’ of the limit.


So ultimately you could be looking at a ban entirely at the discretion of the Magistrates. I would therefore advise prepar- ing mitigation. At that hearing you are more than entitled to present all of the mitigation surrounding the incident itself, the fact that it seems to be out of character considering you have no previous convictions and a clean licence, and also the effect a lengthy disqualification would have on you. With good mitigation we might be able to avoid a ban entirely or at the very least keep any ban to a minimum.


Q


I was looking at drink-driving punishments and wondered if I could confirm whether the following is true - that standing next to a car while over the limit can see you given a fine of £2,500 and three months


JANUARY 2022


The offence you are thinking of is called ‘being in charge of a vehicle with excess alcohol’. It’s slightly different to drink driving.


Drink driving is charged under section 5(1)(a) Road Traffic Act 1988. If guilty, the offender is banned for a minimum 12 months (longer for higher readings). For readings above 90 in breath, they are at risk of a community order (eg tag/curfew), for readings above 120 in breath, at risk of prison.


Being drunk whilst ‘in charge’ of a vehicle is charged under section 5(1)(b). If guilty, the offender receives a minimum 10 penalty points. They are only at risk of a ban for higher readings and would only be at risk of custody in the most severe cases (so very high readings or where there was a high likelihood of driving).


Being ‘in charge’ means that you are just that - ‘in charge’ of a vehicle. The most common example is where someone is stood by the car with the keys in their hand. We have seen people prosecuted in the past for going out to their car to get a pack of cigarettes whilst in their dressing gown!


You are no longer in charge if you relinquish charge – so give charge to someone else (by e.g. giving them the keys) or by locking the car and entering the pub or entering your own home (but, in the example above, if you leave your home and walk towards your car, you may become ‘in charge’ again).


It’s a defence to being ‘in charge’ of a vehicle if the offender can prove on the balance of probabilities that there was no likelihood of them driving whilst above the prescribed limit. So for example, we would defend the lady in her dressing gown by showing she was intending to stay and drink at home all evening, and wasn’t going to drive until the next day when she would have been below the limit. Usually, a toxicologist report is required to show that when you intended to drive the alcohol levels in your blood/breath would have fallen below the limit, and it is strongly recommended to get the support of witnesses who can corroborate that you were not doing to drive.


But if you want to make sure you’re not falling foul of the law, the safest option is not to go anywhere near your car if you’re drinking. Leave the keys at home and leave the car locked and secure.


If you need advice on motoring matters please email advice@pattersonlaw.co.uk or for regular updates on road traffic law follow us on facebook.com/PattersonLawMotoringSolicitors or twitter.com/Patterson_law_


71


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80