search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
TRANSPORT COMMITTEE INQUIRY


Several local authorities have mitigated operational and data recovery issues by mandating that CCTV system providers act as authorised officers, reducing administrative burden and alleviating industry concerns about inappropriate access or “big brother is watching me”.


The principal remaining concern is cost. When Dr Scott Arthur MP asked whether government support would be available, the response stated that the department would issue guidance - despite such guidance already being issued by the ICO in April last year.


The question was clearly about financial support. Precedents already exist, with councils such as York, St Helens, Telford and Barnsley all being successful in securing funding for such schemes in the interest of public protection.


Cross-border working & intended use


While national standards and potential local authority expansion through devolution were cited as solutions to cross-border working and licence shopping, fee disparities remain the core driver. Without addressing this, the issue will persist.


Further measures are therefore required, including: l Intended-use regulations l National oversight of licensing fees


l The inclusion of regulators themselves within the scope of national standards


Enforcement powers


The proposal to grant licensing officers police-style stopping powers is, in my view, misguided. A more effective approach would be to grant police officers licensing enforcement powers. This model already operates successfully in areas with dedicated “Taxi Cop” schemes and avoids duplication of authority while enhancing road safety and compliance.


Devolution


The subject of devolution was mentioned a few times during the session, where it was stated: “if this goes ahead”.


We suggest that if and when this does come to approval stage, that there is one major concern that simply must be addressed:


PHTM FEBRUARY 2026


STRENGTH IN NUMBERS! www.nphta.co.uk


9 Retain existing zones


The reason for this is very clear, and has not only been expressed, but also experienced within regions that have already amalgamated, including Herefordshire, BCP and others.


The potential effect on the end user


There could be a serious lack of provision within regions which suddenly become very large, due to migration to busier areas within the new region, leaving those in rural areas struggling to obtain such services.


Hackney carriage sector


Busier ranks could find themselves flooded by those who may now legally make use of taxi ranks within much busier areas.


Private hire sector and hackney carriage sector


The area that must be studied and tested for applicants would suddenly cover vast regions, which is not only unrealistic, but impractical as many of those drivers may never have any desire to work those larger regions.


Finally, I would like to express my sincere thanks to the Committee and its staff for creating such a welcoming and professional environment throughout this process. While participating was initially daunting, the approach taken by


Committee members and support team made the experience constructive, engaging, and genuinely positive.


Yours sincerely, David Lawrie, Director NPHTA


JOIN US TODAY info@nphta.co.uk


the


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74