search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
ALL THINGS LICENSING


Key questions the consultation poses The consultation has a number of question themes:


l Governance and accountability: how should LTAs be held to account for licensing performance and safety outcomes across large areas?


l Transition and resourcing: what’s the best way to transfer staff, systems, and casework from districts to LTAs without disrupting services or disadvantaging applicants?


l Consistency vs local flexibility: how far should standards be harmonised, and where should local discretion remain (e.g. vehicle age policies, local conditions)?


l Enforcement powers and collaboration: what joint- working arrangements and powers are needed to tackle non compliance and cross-border issues effectively?


What should you do now?


The DfT is seeking views from all stakeholders. Obviously the trade and local authorities will have different approaches in their response. However, there does appear to be an increasing desire from all parties for more consistency.


Licence holders may wish to assess how harmonised standards might impact operating models, cross- border work, and investment decisions (e.g. fleet specifications and accessibility features); prepare constructive feedback on where consistency helps and where local flexibility is vital.


Licensing authorities will need to review current capacity, enforcement arrangements, and digital systems; map how functions could scale to an LTA footprint; and prepare evidence on costs, benefits and transition risks to include in their response.


Timeline and how to respond


The consultation opened on 8 January 2026 and closes at 11:59pm on 1 April 2026. Details on how to respond are on the consultation pages at: https://shorturl.at/R13kK


In addition to the consultation regarding moving licensing responsibility to LTAs, the English Devolution Bill continues to attract interest, particularly with regard to proposals around national standards and potentially legislating to reduce concerns around out- of-area working.


62


Reforming taxi and PHV licensing: what the English Devolution Bill changes mean for councils and the licensed trade


Potentially significant changes to taxi and PHV licensing are moving through Parliament as part of the English Devolution and Community Empower- ment (EDCE) Bill. These reforms seek to address a long-standing national problem: the rise in out-of-area licensing, where drivers are licensed in one authority but operate predominantly in another.


For both local authorities and the licensed trade, these proposals represent the most substantial shift in licensing policy in over a generation.


Why change is being proposed


Concerns around safety, safeguarding, and inconsis- tent licensing standards have been gathering pace nationally. A key driver has been Baroness Casey’s national audit into group based CSE, which high- lighted weaknesses in the current taxi/PHV licensing framework, particularly around vetting and oversight.


The government responded by committing to


strengthen licensing laws through the EDCE Bill. At its core is the reduction in variation between authorities to prevent individuals exploiting regulatory differences by licensing in areas with minimal requirements.


The problem: out of area licensing


Out-of-area working has become central to the national debate. In some regions, most PHV drivers are licensed elsewhere, limiting councils’ ability to enforce standards and protect passengers.


• Greater Manchester, for example, reports that 49% of PHV drivers operating locally are licensed by Wolverhampton City Council, far outside the region. Local leaders, including GM Mayor Andy Burnham, describe this system as “broken”, warning that councils cannot regulate drivers they don’t license, making safeguarding and enforcement significantly harder.


• Indeed, DfT statistics for last year show that over 11% of all PHVs in England are now licensed by Wolver- hampton, up from less than 0.5% a decade ago.


What the EDCE Bill proposes 1. National minimum licensing standards


The most significant amendment is the introduction of national minimum standards for taxi and PHV driver and operator licensing.


FEBRUARY 2026 PHTM


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74