search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
WINDOWS WASHOUT


DERBYSHIRE TAXI AND PRIVATE HIRE DRIVERS ORDERED TO OBEY TINTED WINDOW RULES


A plea from South Derbyshire cabbies to change restrictions on tinted taxi windows has been rejected. According to the Derby Telegraph, more than 120 licensed South Derbyshire taxi and PH drivers had signed a petition opposing restrictions on tinted windows which they said left them “struggling” due to the cost of adaptations. The petition, led by iCars driver Qasim Ali, said there was also no confirmed evidence that tinted windows in taxis/PHVs were the cause of or hindered any major safeguarding incidents, such as child exploitation. On the evening of Wednesday 26 January, at a South Derbyshire District Council meeting, the call to change restrictions was rejected in an aim to prevent any additional risk to children and vulnerable adults. Emma McHugh, a licensing officer, said that 10 to 20 per cent of private hire vehicles which are tested by the council to see if they meet the tinted window policy, fail the test. The policy outlines that PHVs must have a windscreen that allows 75 per cent of light in and all other windows must allow 70 per cent. Ms McHugh said drivers from other licensed areas may drop off customers in South Derbyshire, so may be seen driving through, but they are not legally allowed to pick up passengers within the district. Cllr Andrew MacPherson told the meet- ing: “Part of the complaint is that the cars that suit requirements aren’t readily available. “After some research, there were quite a few as far as I noticed that would fit the criteria quite comfortably. I see no reason to revoke the policy.” Derbyshire Police said there are reports of some taxis in South Derbyshire being used to transport vulnerable chil- dren to places where they are abused. This comes three years after the police made the same claim in response to a


48


petition from cabbies over the tinted taxi windows in Erewash in 2019. Meanwhile, the charity Safe and Sound, based in Derby, also says there is evidence of taxis being used to trans- port vulnerable young people who are being exploited.


Cllr Martin Fitzpatrick said: “I have a tremendous amount of sympathy and admiration for Mr Ali. “Whilst I do not agree with all of the points, he does make a good argument. “It is a shame that because of one or two evil people in the past, the industry is tarred with a bit of suspicion. “Even if there is a miniscule risk and a huge cost (of making vehicles fit restrictions), I would still fall on the side of miniscule risk. “I can’t see, when there are agencies that say there is evidence (of taxis being used to transport children to places where they are abused), that we should make changes to our policy.” Cllr Trevor Southerd, deputy leader of the authority, said: “I have a lot of empathy but we have to urge caution on the part of vulnerable people.” He asked that applicants seeking to become licensed private hire vehicle drivers be made abundantly aware of the tinted window policy before they purchase a vehicle.


Cllr MacPherson said: “It needs to be borne in mind that it (the restrictions) is also reassuring for passengers. “Drivers should be proud that they go the extra mile and are reassuring the public which puts so much trust in them to look after vulnerable friends and members of their family. “It is not about penalising them (drivers), especially when they have done so much for us all during the pandemic, driving us around.” Mr Ali claimed that sourcing a car suit- able to be used for a taxi can cost between £12,000 and £15,000 and often come with tinted windows as standard from the manufacturer.


He said finding cars that come with untinted windows was increasingly rare. Mr Ali said drivers were often having to spend between £350 and £1,000 to change the windows so that their vehicles meet the tint policy. Mmmm..... Qasin Ali is correct, there is absolutely no evidence to suggest tinted windows are a factor in any incidents. In fact, when all police forces in the UK were surveyed by way of FOI requests, they all confirmed that the presence of tinted windows was NOT considered to be a factor.


If this unreasonable and unnecessary condition is not scrapped, then the fail- ure rate of 10-20% is going to increase massively as vehicles are replaced with newer models, as the majority are simply not available with clear glass any more to improve passenger comfort, health and safety, and reduce emissions. Cllr Andrew MacPherson may have found second-hand vehicles, but he needs to remember the age limits, and look at new vehicle availability, at which point he will not find it difficult to verify the claim made, there are very few at all. We ran a two-month campaign on this very topic in July and August 2021 edi- tions of PHTM which clearly spelled out the many reasons why manufacturers make vehicles with rear tints as stan- dard, and the lack of any legal, or justifiable reasons to not allow standard, modern vehicles. It is of course perfectly legal for a pre booked vehicle to pick up their passen- gers, regardless of where that passenger may be located, which includes within the district. Since Derby is also looking at CCTV becoming mandatory soon, this undermines the need for such restrictions anyway, rendering it a pointless condition, regardless of cost, we would urge the committee to reconsider this decision. As for taxis being used for transport, erm, is that not exactly why they are licensed? - Ed.


FEBRUARY 2022


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90