search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
SHAME SHAME


TAXI DRIVERS IN DEVON AND CORNWALL LINKED TO 34 SEXUAL OFFENCES IN THREE YEARS


A Freedom of Information (FOI) request has unveiled the scale of sexual offences committed by taxi drivers across the Devon and Cornwall policing area over the past three financial years. The data released by Devon & Cornwall Police shows the force “recorded 34 offences” between


April 2022 and March 2025. This means that each month during this period, the police recorded between one and two offences. Breaking down the figures, the FOI revealed that “Eleven of the offences related to sexual assault of a female, with 13 relating to rape and the remainder relating to


exposure and sexual com- munication.” Furthermore, the data points to a disturbing time trend, noting that: “Twelve of the total 34 offences were


committed around mid-


night,” suggesting a significant number of incidents are occurring during late-night hours.


BRADFORD UBER DRIVER LOSES APPEAL AFTER CONFRONTATION WITH TRAFFIC WARDEN


A Bradford Uber driver, Mahbub Alam Mamun, 31, has had his appeal dismissed after a court upheld the council’s decision to immediately revoke his private hire licence following an “aggressive” altercation with a parking warden. Mamun appeared at Bradford and Keighley Magistrates’ Court on November 14 to challenge the Bradford Council’s decision, which was made in January of this year. The court heard that Mamun’s licence was revoked after he confronted a council enforcement officer who had issued him a parking ticket for stopping in a bus stop on January 15. Imran Hussain, appearing for the council, stated that upon realising he had been ticketed, Mamun “came out of the store and acted in a threatening and abusive manner.” Body-worn camera footage, played in court,


reportedly showed


Mamun “acting in an aggressive manner” and walking towards the female officer. Mr. Hussain cited several phrases used by Mamun towards the officer, including: “shut


26


the f* up you f****** idiot”; “f**** get out of there” “take another picture again, you b**ch” Steven Knighton, a Regulatory and Compliance Officer at Bradford Council, testified that he watched the footage, noting that Mamun “lunges” towards the female officer and “closes that gap.” Mr. Knighton viewed this as “intimidation,”adding that his “immediate concerns” came from seeing “violence was clearly a matter here,” with “posturing” and “threats.” Mamun, giving evidence, denied being aggressive or threatening. He claimed the officers had been “hiding behind a wall” and “jumped out” when he walked into the shop. He testified: “I just want to put the ticket away and calm the situation,” and “I didn’t lunge towards them, I didn’t threaten violence.” The court also heard that Mamun’s complaint history from Uber showcased a number of reported incidents, including multiple customer reports of “driving in a dangerous manner,” and driving


on the wrong side of the road. Mamun, however,


argued that


none of these complaints had been upheld by


Uber, suggesting


customers often file them “maliciously.” Mr. Knighton explained that immediate revocations are used in cases involving “violence, aggression, or offences of a sexual nature” and “are designed to protect the public.” He posed a critical question to the court: “What would happen if there was a dispute around the fare and somebody couldn’t exit the vehicle, how would the driver react?” Mr. Hussain stressed the para- mount importance of public safety, asking the court: “A rule of thumb, would you be happy letting your wife, husband, child or anyone you care about go with this driver..” The magistrates ultimately rejected Mamun’s account. The head magistrate, told Mamun: “You say you wanted to get away from the situation but there was no situation.” He concluded: “The compliance manager was correct and this appeal is dismissed.”


DECEMBER 2025 PHTM


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76