search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
ROUND THE COUNCILS MIDLOTHIAN:


TINTED WINDOW RULE RELAXED


Midlothian Council has relaxed its strict rules on tinted windows, acknowledging concerns from local drivers. The previous regulations required taxi windows to meet a specific light transmission level, which often clashed with the factory-fitted windows of newer vehicles. This forced drivers to incur significant costs to replace the windows, as highlighted by the Midlothian Taxi Owners Association which argued that the stringent rules were


outdated and unnecessary. They


emphasised the financial burden and potential safety implications of replacing factory-fitted windows. In a letter to the council’s general purposes chairperson Cllr David Virgo, the association said: “We feel a relaxation of the strict vehicle window tinting requirements would form best practice and save operators money and improve safety. “We recently had an owner change the rear windows in their vehicle to meet requirements. This cost was in excess of £2,000. Unless you own a ‘window tint light meter’, then it’s often very difficult, if not impossible, to tell if windows


are compliant or not when


purchasing a vehicle for use as a private hire.” In response to these concerns, the council has adjusted the regulations. The new rules now require a minimum light transmission level of 65% for rear windows, excluding tailgate glass, a more lenient standard than the previous 70%. Councillors acknowledged the changing landscape of the taxi industry and the need for regulations to adapt to


modern vehicle designs. The committee unanimously approved the changes to the regulations.


YORK: COUNCIL REJECTS BLACK LIVERY POLICY


On 8 October City of York Council’s licensing and regulatory committee discussed draft proposals for the new licensing policy. These included a maximum age limit of 10 years for all petrol, diesel and hybrid taxis over 75g /km except WAVs which would have to be Euro VI or better, and that all hackneys should be black. At the full council meeting held on 21 November, Cllr Kate Ravilious, Executive Member for Transport, defended the broader policy aims, stating that the proposed changes aligned with national best practice and would enhance safety and environmental standards.


PHTM DECEMBER 2024


However, Arshad Mahmood, Chairman of York City Taxi Association (YCTA), argued that that the proposed changes would impose a significant financial burden on taxi drivers and that it was unreasonable to make all hackneys black to improve safety whilst there are no safety measures in place for the hundreds of out-of- town black PHVs regularly working in the city. When it came to the vote, 14 councillors voted in favour of black only hackney carriages, four abstained but 24 voted against and so the policy was rejected.


GWYNEDD: LICENSING PROCESS CHALLENGED


A former school bus driver, with a 42-year-old conviction for assault causing actual bodily harm, has been granted a taxi licence by Gwynedd Council’s general licensing sub-committee. The applicant, who was 18 years’ old at the time of the offence, had since been employed as a school bus driver for ten years, a role requiring trust and responsibility. During his application for a hackney/PH driver’s licence, the representative for the applicant challenged the council’s licensing process. He had asked why a hearing had had to be held, and why the council’s environment department did not have “delegated powers to approve the application” thus bypassing the need for a sub-committee, which meant “unnecessary costs to the taxpayer.” The applicant had been unemployed while waiting for a hearing and felt that the process was “unsuitable”. Responding, the council’s licensing manager noted that the Gwynedd Delegated Rights Scheme had “arrangements in place” whereby an application with any offence appearing on the applicants’ DBS would be presented to a sub-committee for a decision. It was “in accordance with the council’s constitution” that neither she nor the head of the environment department had the power to make a decision be that due to a historical conviction or otherwise”. However, the procedure and process were being reviewed with discussions taking place with the legal department to consider cases where a decision could be delegated. Any amendment to the Constitution would be presented to the Licensing Committee and to the Full Council. Despite the past conviction, the sub-committee granted the application and determined that the applicant was “a fit and proper person” to hold a 12- month hackney and private hire vehicle driver’s licence.


25


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74